Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DustyMoment
This was a crock. I believe there are two main reasons for a spacing requirement.

First, obviously, is to support the cable(s) during all anticipated g loading. It probably does not matter if the spacing is 1 inch, or 1.25, or 0.75... There is probably plenty of strength. Exactly 1 inch sounds like a nice round number for the convenience of the assembler and inspector, not an exact engineering requirement.

Second, is so that the cables don't flex, rubbing against other cables/wires in the assembly or any nearby structures and abrade through insulation. This requirement is there for the long haul. A few more hours flight time with marginal ties isn't going to make any difference. If you're looking at thousands of hours over the lifetime of the aircraft, yes, you want to minimize this effect. But a dozen more hops? I doubt it would make any perceptible difference.

I think AA got it in the shorts from the FAA. I'd have flown on any of those aircraft...

23 posted on 04/11/2008 6:41:50 AM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: CodeMasterPhilzar
First, obviously, is to support the cable(s) during all anticipated g loading. It probably does not matter if the spacing is 1 inch, or 1.25, or 0.75... There is probably plenty of strength. Exactly 1 inch sounds like a nice round number for the convenience of the assembler and inspector, not an exact engineering requirement.

But engineering requirements don't matter if you're a power-mad bureaucrat trying to show the productive and profit-earning people, who for some unfathomable reason have to do what you say, who's boss.

25 posted on 04/11/2008 6:49:46 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson