Of course she lied; she moved her lips, didn’t she?
Hillary wants to piggy-back on her husband (ugh! horrible mental image!) to make believe she has so much experience. First, she tried to cherry-pick anything good that Bill did (there wasn’t much) and claim it for her own, while saying that she had nothing to do with anything bad.
She has now taken that one step further, depending on her target audience. If that audience was helped by a particular Bill Clinton initiative, then Hillary was all for it. Conversely, when speaking to blue-collar workers in Ohio or Pennsylvania who believe they were hurt by a Clinton policy (like NAFTA,) Hillary will disavow it, even if she had touted it and supported it in the past. Two-faced liar doesn’t begin to describe her.
US Democratic presidential candidate Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) gestures as she addresses the audience at the Allegheny County Democratic Committee's Jefferson/Jackson Dinner at Heinz Field, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania April 10 2008. REUTERS/David DeNoma
Those rascally Clintons are at it again... This is out of the same Clinton playbook that was used in the memorable incident when some minor Clinton appointee/stooge claimed at a Congressional hearing that he was now telling the truth, but that previously he had lied when writing things in his diary... And he got away with it... And Hillary! will get away with this, too...
I'm tempted to ask, "where's the outrage", but it didn't work back then, so I doubt that it would work now, either...
She’s a pathological liar. She totally supported NAFTA. Here’s a video that shows she’s lying again....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BrPZYbCdJ4
Both Clinton and her Democratic presidential rival Sen. Barack Obama are criticizing liberalized trade agreements as they campaign for blue-collar votes in Pennsylvania, where shuttered factories speak of a decline in manufacturing... Both candidates oppose the free trade agreement with Colombia that President Bush has submitted for congressional approval. They've had more trouble dissociating themselves from the much more consequential North American Free Trade Agreement; Clinton especially, because she spoke up for its passage and early results when her husband Bill was president, years before Obama came to Washington... "I have been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning. I didn't have a public position on it because I was part of the (Clinton) administration. But when I started running for the Senate, I have been a critic." ...Hillary Clinton spoke at a November 1993 NAFTA meeting at which 120 were scheduled to attend; participants described it as a NAFTA cheering session capped by remarks from the first lady when the push was at its peak to get the deal approved. Two at the meeting, representing textile and apparel importers, told ABC News that Hillary Clinton was the highlight of the "100 percent pro-NAFTA event" and expressed not a "hint of waffling" on the deal. In 1996, she said the trade deal with Mexico and Canada was giving U.S. workers a chance to compete. "That's what a free and fair trade agreement like NAFTA is all about," she said. "I think NAFTA is proving its worth." ...In his 2004 Illinois Senate campaign, Obama said the U.S. should pursue more deals such as NAFTA. The Associated Press reported then that Obama had spoken of enormous benefits having accrued to his state from NAFTA... That nuance was lost when he declared in February that "I don't think NAFTA has been good for Americans, and I never have."They were both for it before they were against it.