But according to you, the question is settled.
I don't appreciate goading. Saying "the science is settled" and then ridiculing that position indicates a significant misunderstanding of how the scientific process converges toward an accurate characterization of the physical mechanisms which produce the reality of observations.
As a case example, examine how the science became "settled" regarding the current state of the theory of plate tectonics.
And by the way — this article shows the same level of misunderstanding.
Mellow a little why don’t you. We need more people like cogitator here on FR. He has a very good grasp of the Climate Crises issue from the alarmist perspective and for a good discussion it is important to have opposing points of view.
Cogitator has performed a very valuable service for us freepers over the years and we shouldn’t forget that. Especially now that we just might be getting the evidence we need to prove that Global warming is not accelerating.