Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory

“I do not want to see the case screwed up because the police are being their usual incompetent selves.”

Are you telling me if at a jury trial you had the victim ID the perp as to sexual and physical abuse and you’d vote to acquit because the cops got the man’s wrong on a search warrant?


121 posted on 04/09/2008 12:31:50 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: marajade

The Judge would throw out all of the evidence long before it ever got to a jury.


124 posted on 04/09/2008 12:33:05 PM PDT by CholeraJoe (Flatland Warrior: "All your Jap auto plants are belong to us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: marajade
Are you telling me if at a jury trial you had the victim ID the perp as to sexual and physical abuse and you’d vote to acquit because the cops got the man’s wrong on a search warrant?


No, I am telling you that LONG before it even gets to the jury there will be a motion to surpress which will challenge everything derrived from the warrent and create usless delay on the case.


if the judge grants the motion as a matter of law, the issue will never even REACH the jury.

I like the carpenter's saying, measure twice cut once. The cops screwed up and this NO MATTER HOW IT FALLS will cause delay in the case and cause suffering to these kids all because some cop got cocky.
212 posted on 04/09/2008 2:10:04 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson