Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The problem is that the employer/store owner policy restricts the right of the employee/customer to carry between their residence and their place of work/a store.

The compromise here is that an employee's car is an extension of their home and not subject to the employer's whims, provided the employee has a concealed carry permit.

Every mass murder in the last 20 years occurred or started in a “gun free” zone. IMNSHO: Any employer/retailer/government agency that establishes a “gun free” zone should assume all liability for the person's safety from the last place they could have carried.

19 posted on 04/09/2008 10:16:10 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: fireforeffect

I don’t disagree, I just wonder how the nasty entanglement of cross-relevant rights will end up playing out.


22 posted on 04/09/2008 1:40:42 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Men fight well when they know that no prisoners will be taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson