Definitely. Or should I say Absolutly.
Kidding aside, though, if you figure out how to word facts that support conservatism in a reasonably objective manner, your edits will stay in articles.
I’ve done it for years with articles. A lot of conservatives make the mistake that just because they don’t think Wikipedia is credible, no one else thinks so. This is far from the case.
Wikipedia matters a lot because its pages are so prominent in Google searchs. Most times when you’re looking for something, the Wikipedia entry for it will pop up as the #1 link. Almost always in the top five. This is a huge opportunity for the right since the rest of the top sites on the web (Wikipedia is #9 in the world) shut out conservative voices through editorial processes and hiring biases.
The only reason Wikipedia leans left is because more conservatives aren’t out there doing their part to make it fair.
Maybe another thing that can be done is to quietly, innocuously insert links to conservative articles, papers, stories etc. into the articles without any language at all. This gives the double duty of creating a link to a conservative site if you choose the article location well, and this link then enhances the search engine ranking of the conservative site.