Posted on 04/08/2008 9:03:39 AM PDT by GoldwaterInstitute
Sophistry from the Superior Court : Ruling on CityNorth amends the state Constitution Without A Vote by the People
Robert Robb, Goldwater Institute Daily Email, April 08, 2008
The Superior Court decision upholding the massive subsidy Phoenix gave CityNorth is an exercise in legal sophistry.
Judge Robert Miles held that there were considerable public benefits from the building of the shopping center, and so there wasn't a violation of the state Constitution's gift clause.
There is not, however, a public purpose or benefits exception to the gift clause ban. It states that no Arizona government "shall ever give or loan its credit in the aid of, or make any donation or grant, by subsidy or otherwise, to any . . . corporation." Period.
The only legal issue in the case should have been whether Phoenix was paying a market rate for a specific good or service for its tax rebate. And that should have been easily disposed of. Cities don't have to pay shopping centers nearly $100 million to provide free parking at their developments. And that's a tad high for 200 park-and-ride spaces. At one point, Phoenix was requiring developers to provide easements for transit as a condition of zoning.
If the court manufactures a public purpose exemption from the gift clause ban and then defers to local governments as to what constitutes a public benefit, the gift clause will have, for all practical purposes, no meaning. And the court will have amended the state Constitution without a vote of the people.
Robert Robb is a columnist for the Arizona Republic. This article originally appeared in the Arizona Republic.
Who has the standing and the resources to do seek the obvious relief?
This is a trend. California, after Prop 13, made massive shifts in its means of funding essential and proper duties of the state to circumvent the will of its citizens; and got away with it. The abuse continues.
Any solution from any similar State abuse will benefit every citizen-taxpayer in the United states.
Public Employees have "unions". Welfare recipients have "unions".
Perhaps citizen-taxpayers should create (and fund) a parallel government to cancel the socialist, self-serving corrupt (how much have the Clintons and Gore "earned" since leaving office?) welfare state...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.