To: Heatseeker
I’d go with the cannibalism, since it’s technically recycling and is therefore “green”.
6 posted on
04/06/2008 8:49:00 PM PDT by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: domenad
I dunno, the whole cannibalism thing worries me. I have an alternate theory on Mad Cow/Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease wherein it's not so much the fact that you're eating the dead of your own species, it's that you're eating the dead who have holes in their brains, i.e. liberals.
After all, having global warning reduce me to cannibalism is one thing, but get holes in my brain from all the holes in the brains of people who are scared of global warming in the first place, now that's scary.
10 posted on
04/06/2008 8:57:13 PM PDT by
Heatseeker
(To err is human, but to really screw up it takes the Berkeley City Council)
To: domenad
YUK
Can we at least feed the people to something like maybe fish and then eat the fish? It’s probably not quite as efficient, but it’s a little more appealing.
13 posted on
04/06/2008 9:02:18 PM PDT by
mamelukesabre
(Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
To: domenad
I’d go with the cannibalism, since it’s technically recycling and is therefore “green”.
Now thats a modest proposal.
26 posted on
04/06/2008 11:20:21 PM PDT by
ehit88
(I'm(not anymore)shoveling snow while a Cubs game is on?????(my Alan Keyes t-shirts are on order))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson