To: kellynla
“Do you deny that Mary the Mother of Jesus was a virgin?”
No. I’m a believer. I didn’t word my original comment correctly. It should have said “Mary and Joseph had kids together after Mary bore Jesus by the fatherhood of the Holy Spirit, not Joseph.” Mary was certainly a virgin when Jesus was born but certainly not after all those other children, mentioned in Mattew 13:55
23 posted on
04/07/2008 3:06:10 PM PDT by
RoadTest
( None calleth for justice, nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies - Isaiah)
To: RoadTest
Where, precisely, are Jesus’ brothers described as Mary’s sons? Why does St. John take charge of Mary at the Crucifixion if these numerous other brothers remain?
24 posted on
04/07/2008 4:22:18 PM PDT by
Philo-Junius
(One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
To: RoadTest
but certainly not after all those other children?"mentioned in Mattew 13:55
"the 'brothers of Jesus' are neither the sons of Mary, nor the brothers of Our Lord in the proper sense of the word, but they are His cousins or the more or less near relatives. [70] The Church insists that in His birth the Son of God did not lessen but consecrate the virginal integrity of His mother (Secret in Mass of Purification). The Fathers express themselves in similar language concerning this privilege of Mary. [71] http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm
The Perpetual Virginity of Blessed Mary http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3007.htm
28 posted on
04/07/2008 4:52:11 PM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson