The main supporter of the treaty is the United Nations whose humble beginnings as an eleemosynary institution was too restrictive for it's big spending, fascist ideals. And so the UN has embarked on a course of developing some kind of world tax (with out any representation on the part of the taxed) with which to fund it's expansion. The underlying appeal in these scheme is fear mongering.
Because of America's singular propensity of extreme generosity in the in the face of any country's disaster and/or hardships, the UN has realized that America's love of altruistic,benevolent, charity can be exploited.
It has only been recently, with the internet's access to all kinds of historical, technical and factual data that we have had the ability to question what has actually been done with money. Or to even question what these people have said about the climate for example. If we hadn't developed this ability, of independently being able to analyze data and to publish instantly on the web our views, the mass media would have remained the last word on the subject.
Thank you, but my original question (I think) was did the predictions of 5, 10 15 or 20 yr ago about how hot it would be in 2009 prove to be accurate or wrong?