Posted on 04/03/2008 6:04:13 PM PDT by blam
Here come the lawyers.
Honestly, if this stuff is so prevalent, why don’t men get as many breast cancers as women?
Because we don’t have as many breast cells as women do. Smaller population = smaller probability of real problem cells.
MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY
I am getting sick and tired of MAY. May cause cancer, may cause global warming, may slow global warming, may this, may that. Enough already. When you have proof of anything, come back and give us a truthful story instead of scare crap!
Fact, Hillary and O’Bama are both liars. Fact!
I have some serious doubts about this.
Note to self
Never scrub my wifes breasts with Ajax or Chlorox ..!
“Honestly, if this stuff is so prevalent, why donât men get as many breast cancers as women?”
Exactly.
Can’t be environmental, must be hormonal.
Mega increase in breast cancer rates just happened to coincide with legal, frequent abortion rates.
Duh.
Men are screened for them, but Yes, men rarely get breast cancer. I would suspect it has to do with the fat solubility of Bisphenol A that could concentrate it is some tissues.
This subject has come up before, and at that time I had checked to see if people who run injection molding machines (That use hot molten Lexan) and who are exposed to thousands of times the fumes as the general population had shown any carcinogenesis, but found no references in that search. BPA is used in other polymers also.
The MSDS says, "May be harmful - toxicology not fully investigated. Experimental teratogen. May affect fertility. May cause sensitization. "
The Trial Lawyers made a try on Teflon two years ago, praying that Teflon gave off toxic fumes. That one fell apart.
Expect the ads soon.
I don’t know if this stuff is the real culprit in breast cancer, but something sure is. There seems to be an epidemic of it. Out of 150 women in our office, a dozen or so have breast cancer. That’s a fairly high percentage. A lovely young mother in my neighborhood is dying from breast cancer. Three cousins have had it (that branch of the family has a genetic predisposition). Looking at death records from the nineteenth century, breast cancer was not often listed as a cause or contribution to death, and the medical literature back then doesn’t speak of it often.
I only drink 2 or 3 sodas a month now, but I get the Canadian JONES brand or the American Polar Classic - in glass bottles and made with real sugar -
One thing for sure, the FDA doesn't give a rat's rump about our health. They are owned by the chemical companies...
How many prescription drugs get recalled year after year - after hundreds die...
gotta be our own researcher...
(I really like the Polar Classics sodas - they have the old flavors: Orange Cream, Vanilla Cream and Root Beer...now if they'd only make Moxie!)
You may have a point.
Oh GAK that is nasty stuff!!
I think it has to do with birth control pills.
Have a feeling that the Alar commotion is about to be repeated.
I don't doubt that your statement is accurate, but there are other possible explanations. For example, look at the higher rate of women dying in childbirth-- many women did not live long enough to develop breast cancer. One possible cause of the increase in cancer is simply that it typically develops later in life; longer life spans now mean that many people are living long enough to develop it. Many nineteenth century women who might have developed breast cancer later in life instead died from complications in childbirth, diphtheria, cholera, typhoid....
According to McCullough, John Adams' daughter died of breast cancer.
From Wikipedia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.