Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Chertoff’s Insult
New York Times ^ | April 3, 2008

Posted on 04/03/2008 7:10:35 AM PDT by reaganaut1

To the long list of things the Bush administration is willing to trash in its rush to appease immigration hard-liners, you can now add dozens of important environmental laws and hundreds of thousands of acres of fragile habitat on the southern border.

On Tuesday, Michael Chertoff, the secretary of homeland security, waived the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act and other environmental protections to allow the government to finish building 700 or so miles of border fence by year’s end without undertaking legally mandated reviews of the consequences for threatened wildlife and their habitats.

Will this stop or slow illegal immigration? No. Long experience has shown that billions of barricade-building dollars will simply shift some of the flow to more remote parts of the 2,000-mile southern border. And no amount of border fence will keep out the 40 percent of illegal immigrants who enter legally then stay too long.

It will be a disaster on the ground. One example of what’s at risk is the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge. It runs in checkerboard fashion along the 200 miles of the Rio Grande before it empties into the Gulf of Mexico. When the fence is finished, most of the refuge’s 95,000 acres — and the ocelots, jaguarundis and other rare species that live there — would wind up on the side of the fence closest to Mexico, virtually impossible to monitor and protect. Other sensitive areas in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas would also be affected.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: borderfence; chertoff; homelandsecurity; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: reaganaut1
I say again -if all the illegal immigration happened at JFK the NYT would of shut it down years ago.
21 posted on 04/03/2008 7:46:22 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

the Bush administration is willing to trash in its rush to . . .

ENFORCE THE LAW.

Trash? What an interesting choice of words to report a long delayed enforcement of law.


22 posted on 04/03/2008 7:47:09 AM PDT by tennteacher (Hunter Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Only a little off topic, but Mark Kerkorian is now on Laura Ingraham’s show. He mentioned that McCain and others are now dismissing the immigration issue as something people don’t care so much about.

But he had results from a poll that showed that over half those who voted for McCain thought he was for strict enforcement, and 10% thought he wants to round them all up and deport them. He said McCain “bamboozled” the voters during the primaries.

Maybe there’ll be a story on his findings that can be posted later, but this is what I’ve suspected, that many of those voting for McCain fell for the war hero image and knew little about his stance on immigration and other issues.


23 posted on 04/03/2008 7:48:33 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

jaguarundis? Well, I sure didn’t know they wear them, but I for one will pitch in to buy the jaguars new undis as long as the fence gets built ; )


24 posted on 04/03/2008 7:52:00 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Based on what I have seen, the tsunami of garbage-tossing Mexicans flooding across our border, dribbling feces and snack food trash along the way seems to easily be a far greater threat to the “fragile desert ecosystem” than would a fence. All the damage a fence could do to migratory paths of “endangered” or “threatened” species is nothing compared to the ecological consequences a smuggled dirty bomb would bring to the US.

Sometimes an excecutive-level decision must be made to proceed in light of the broader picture in spite of the local effects of the decision. Memo to DHS: Please proceed at maximum speed to build an effective fence. We can attempt to mitigate any ecological consequences afterwords.

25 posted on 04/03/2008 7:59:25 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
>> When the fence is finished, most of the refuge's 95,000 acres — and the ocelots, jaguarundis and other rare species that live there — would wind up on the side of the fence closest to Mexico, virtually impossible to monitor and protect... <<

A wonderfully worded Grand Worry. But somehow, I think the author is really worried that the open border would be closed. When the fence is finished, most the thousands of illegal invaders who invade and destroy the refuge's "fragile ecosystem" would wind up on the side of the fence closet to their native Mexico, finding it virtually impossible to cross the border to steal jobs from Americans by stealing their identity and SSN.
26 posted on 04/03/2008 8:05:03 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY

“I’m sure the ones we have up here around San Antonio will be just fine. They’re cool lookin’ critters!”

Can you eat them? I’d hate to cut off our supply if they are edible.


27 posted on 04/03/2008 8:09:26 AM PDT by Belasarius (Yet man is born unto trouble, as the sparks fly upward. Job 5:2-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Congress passed legislation allowing the environmental reviews to be waived. They are, therefore, not “legally required”. The NY Times remains as full of shit as ever.


28 posted on 04/03/2008 8:22:42 AM PDT by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

29 posted on 04/03/2008 8:30:41 AM PDT by mirkwood (Good gun control is a sharp eye and a steady hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Belasarius
“Can you eat them? I’d hate to cut off our supply if they are edible.”

Nah, they're cats; not particularly big either. They're shorter legged than most cats, with a long tail, and kind of elongated in the body (picture a feline dachshund). Their size is between that of a big housecat and a bobcat.
They have a coat that appears similar to a regular Jaguar.

30 posted on 04/04/2008 6:14:33 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( Terrorism is a symptom, ISLAM IS THE DISEASE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson