As I wrote in my previous post to you, my objection is one of scope. You don't have to guess at all; rather, you do so that you can keep beating the dead horse you tried to sell earlier on in the thread. But since you insist upon being obtuse:
- An uncorroborated accusation from an unreliable source already in trouble with authorities is grounds enough to conduct a strip-search on a minor without parental knowledge, let alone parental consent.
- Possession of Advil is now treated the same way as possession of hardcore drugs.
As a reasonable human being, let alone one of the "conservative" political persuasion, you're not alarmed that the administrator's response---again, based on nothing but an uncorroborated accusation---was "have the girl strip down and expose her privates?" That doesn't bother you in the least? That's perfectly reasonable to you?
Advil Schmadvil. Leave it out of your argument. It could have been cocaine and you're saying she shouldn't have been searched based on the above. Fine.
I'm simply saying that decision would leave little Miss Drug Dealer in business and open up the school for future lawsuits. (You were told she was dealing drugs and you did nothing? You didn't even search her?)