For students? Surely you jest.
"In a 6-3 decision issued by Justice White in New Jersey v. T. L. O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985), The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the search and seizure by school officials without a warrant was constitutional as long as the search was deemed reasonable given the circumstances. The Court reaffirmed that there is a balancing between the individual's--even a child's--legitimate expectation of privacy and the school's interest in maintaining order and discipline. Accordingly, school officials do not need a warrant to search the belongings of students, but they do require a "reasonable suspicion"."
"This reasonable suspicion test, meaning the reasonableness of the search under all the circumstances, is a lesser standard than the Probable Cause standard. Such reasonableness is based on two criteria: 1, whether the action was justified at its inception; 2, whether the search as actually conducted was unreasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place."
Not even in the same league outside of balancing tests used.
Does "belongings" include the students' bodies? I doubt it. Lockers and back packs are one thing. A strip search is a whole 'nother matter.
Wow. You favor strip searching little girls just because they might be suspected of carrying contraband like Advil that would disrupt order and discipline?