Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobRoy

>>The service is not for children. It is for children that are students in public schools<<

No, it’s for the children in a district.
We have friends with children in private schools that take advantage of Speech Therapy in the public.

You, like this district, are making your own rules with the homeschooler’s money.


43 posted on 04/02/2008 7:53:44 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am very mad at Disney. Give me my James Marsden song!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom; RobRoy
You, like this district, are making your own rules with the homeschooler’s money.

RobRoy's not making the rules. In the situation in the article, the New York legislature has made the rules, and the school district is interpreting the rules (it appears) within the discretionary space left by the law.

Other states have different laws and different levels of school district discretion.

As RobRoy so brilliantly put it, "The problem is the game itself."

48 posted on 04/02/2008 7:58:54 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Everything is either willed or permitted by God, and nothing can hurt me." Bl. Charles de Foucauld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

>>No, it’s for the children in a district.
We have friends with children in private schools that take advantage of Speech Therapy in the public.

You, like this district, are making your own rules with the homeschooler’s money.<<

I could be. If what you say is true, then this can easily be resolved in court. And there should be punitive damages.


59 posted on 04/02/2008 8:20:01 AM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson