You know, fixing this country means fixing the Democratic Party too. If they get beat every time they put up a gun-grabbing, pro-abort, military hater, they will eventually stop, even if the person beating their gun-grabbing, pro-abort is a gun-grabbing, pro-abort who has proclaimed that he has repented.
We will all be better off.
That would be a conservative. Not allowed in the Dimocrap party.
>>If it was Jule vs. Hillobama, I’d vote for Julie.
You know, fixing this country means fixing the Democratic Party too. If they get beat every time they put up a gun-grabbing, pro-abort, military hater, they will eventually stop, even if the person beating their gun-grabbing, pro-abort is a gun-grabbing, pro-abort who has proclaimed that he has repented.
We will all be better off.<<
That’s an interesting way to look at it. The anti-McCain idea that voting for McCain is, in effect, proving to the GOP that it can continue to drift leftward. You are saying that the same idea applies to Dems. I’m not sure HillObama is worse than GoreKerry.
Is McCain worse than GW Bush? I don’t think Bush started breaking his promises before he was elected. At CPAC McCain promised that he would secure the border first, and since then he has repeated that promise, but his actions are those of a man who does not want to keep that promise.
It’s really a very complicated and depressing decision this time for voters. No matter whether I vote or not, no matter who gets my vote if I do vote, it’s going to help our nation go leftward.
All 3 candidates would push an amnesty that would provide millions of new Dem (or worse) voters, and consequently the left would control all 3 branches, possibly forever, unless leftists themselves changed when thay saw the disaster they caused. I hope McCain would not turn the USA into the mess that California is.