Skip to comments.
IBM temporarily barred from government business
MarketWatch ^
| 3/31/2008
| John Letzing
Posted on 03/31/2008 8:01:42 PM PDT by revtown
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Looks like IBM got caught doing something wrong. I wonder if this applies to IBM as a sub-contractor? That would huge.
1
posted on
03/31/2008 8:01:42 PM PDT
by
revtown
To: revtown
2
posted on
03/31/2008 8:02:36 PM PDT
by
revtown
To: revtown
3
posted on
03/31/2008 8:02:49 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: revtown
Ridiculous.
The govt would cut off it's nose to spite it's face? I think not.
That would be like barring General Dynamics from Defense contracts.
IBM IS the government.
4
posted on
03/31/2008 8:04:31 PM PDT
by
Mariner
To: revtown
EPA employee gave information to IBM employee that may have been used in a bid. This could be a violation of:
Federal law
EPA contract guidance
IBM business conduct policy
To: Mariner
“IBM said that the U.S. attorney’s office served “IBM and certain employees with grand-jury subpoenas requesting testimony and documents” related to interaction between EPA and company employees. IBM said it plans to contest the suspension, which can continue for an initial period of up to one year.”
If IBM contests it, maybe the suspension will be held up pending the investigation and by then IBM will settle up and pay a fine.
6
posted on
03/31/2008 8:08:39 PM PDT
by
revtown
To: ShadowAce
7
posted on
03/31/2008 8:10:29 PM PDT
by
KoRn
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: Mariner
IBM is small potatoes these days. Sounds like someone was trying to play catch-up.
8
posted on
03/31/2008 8:10:32 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: revtown
9
posted on
03/31/2008 8:14:34 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(http://www.fourfriedchickensandacoke.blogspot.com)
To: revtown
That would be huge. Usually some subsidiary of the main company actually bids on the contract to prevent that very thing.
To: revtown
How the mighty have fallen...
11
posted on
03/31/2008 8:17:51 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
To: revtown
Doesn’t China own IBM????
12
posted on
03/31/2008 8:20:03 PM PDT
by
Fox_Mulder77
(Atypical Black Person)
To: Fox_Mulder77
A Chinese company bought their PC business, is all, IIRC.
13
posted on
03/31/2008 8:23:51 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(http://www.fourfriedchickensandacoke.blogspot.com)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
14
posted on
03/31/2008 8:25:50 PM PDT
by
Fox_Mulder77
(Atypical Black Person)
To: muawiyah
"IBM is small potatoes these days".
I don't know why you would say such a thing, unless it's from ignorance...or a different metric than I would use.
The Fed govt, and MOST agencies within the Federal Govt...could not function without IBM's largest computers. The IRS. FDA. SEC. EVERY AGENCY with the government has a BIG, BLUE IBM Mainframe...or dozens of them.
The desktop doesn't matter if you can't process payroll or collect taxes.
Sheesh.
15
posted on
03/31/2008 8:27:45 PM PDT
by
Mariner
To: muawiyah
IBM is small potatoes these days. That's what they WANT you to think! :-)
16
posted on
03/31/2008 8:27:59 PM PDT
by
JennysCool
(They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
To: revtown
Here in Austin IBM bidded, and won, the contract for the State of Texas to migrate MOST of TX systems/transactions moving to the I-Series (AS/400) in a monstrous migration project from the MVS and other systems.
Turns out IBM *way* underbid the contract to get it, and is underperforming.
I got a bunch of headhunting calls and emails for the migration, and all of them had no real clue what needed to be done.
Glad I didn’t get into the conversion.
17
posted on
03/31/2008 8:30:55 PM PDT
by
txhurl
To: muawiyah
You are kidding, right? IBM is freakin huge still in corporate/government land.
18
posted on
03/31/2008 9:16:09 PM PDT
by
rb22982
To: revtown; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
19
posted on
04/01/2008 3:52:29 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: revtown
IBMers have to read and certify their commitment to IBM's Business Conduct Guidelines every year.
If an IBMer behaved unlawfully or even unethically in this situation, their career is over.
IBM has hundreds of thousands of employees. Whether an IBMer is at fault or not in this situation, some IBMers will occasionally screw up and and pay the price with their job (or worse). IBM suffers the consequences and moves on without them, admonishing those that remain.
20
posted on
04/01/2008 4:08:39 AM PDT
by
EasySt
(Life is precious. Live it well...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson