Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Whatever...

.................................

I thought the conservative movement wanted less government influence in people's lives, yet over and over again they want government laws to tell you what to do. They do this by legislating morality.

From the federal Terri Schiavo's Law, to Rhonda Storm's intelligent design bill disguised as "academic freedom," to this abortion bill, conservatives want government control of your moral choice. It is getting to the point where I can't tell a conservative from a liberal. Both want all problems solved by government.

It is becoming difficult to vote for either party these days. Do I want the liberal government telling me what to do or the religious right "conservatives" making me live in the way they see fit?........

Another Move By Government To Legislate Morality

8mm

126 posted on 04/09/2008 3:39:22 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: All
A different view of Terri's plight: It is described here as a large impact on the public as a civil case. Funny, I think of it as a criminal case. Maybe one day...

Despite the media's focus on the daily dramas of real litigants and their lawyers, the impact of judicial decisions may affect those who aren't even parties to a specific case. Though the criminal prosecutions of Michael Jackson and O.J. Simpson captured enormous public attention, the same could be said for civil cases involving Terry Schiavo, Elian Gonzales, Bush v. Gore, and Big Tobacco -- cases which were likely to have much more impact on the lives of everyday citizens than matters centering on the fate of Scott Peterson or the actor formerly known as Baretta............

Overview of Civil Cases

8mm

127 posted on 04/09/2008 3:48:16 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: 8mmMauser

This sounds like the rantings of a typical libertarian (and unfortunately FR still has a few of these disruptors). They seem to have a total inability to distinguish between “limited” government and “no” government and they are actually anarchists who prefer the latter. They don’t want anyone to tell them that they can’t smoke pot, watch porn, use prostitutes and kill those they no longer consider useful.


133 posted on 04/09/2008 5:29:55 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson