Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Openly carrying gun not a crime
The Columbus Dispatch ^ | March 30, 2008 | Bill Bush

Posted on 03/30/2008 12:35:05 PM PDT by buccaneer81

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-182 next last
To: Grunthor; ol' hoghead
*“As a police officer, we also have the right to protect ourselves from the public.”

How is a man carrying openly, not hiding his weapon, any threat to you or anyone else?

Just the fact that a civilian is armed is enough for some LEO's to get that rush of testosterone and adrenaline. They feel the need to control those they forget they're employed to serve. Those sort are the type who will enter the wrong house on a whim or a warrant and shoot the occupants and try to squirm out of the consequences.

Any LEO who is so flippant and greasy to claim they're in need of protection from the people is one cop who needs to be fired and sent to scraping the walls of the city sewers.

I sincerely pity the victims of their "protection".

121 posted on 03/30/2008 6:38:50 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: tet68
The landscape of RKBA is strewn with anomalies and obscure exceptions and regulations.

Most people, especially Law Enforcement and Judges and Lawyers are unfamilar with most of them.

I know a farmer who clobbered a Wildlife Officer when the officer tried to ticket him for illegal harvest of beavers.

Turns out in his jurisdiction work agricultural operations have license over nuisance animals and the Game Wardens have NO, ie ZERO jurisdiction

The judge did not know it, the game warden did not know it, but the farmer had the statutes entered into the record and that was the end of that.

It is similar to my attempt to explain to RobertPaulsen that prisoners legally can and do and have had in the past weapons in their possession while incarcerated.

It is in the Penal Code, there are extant examples, but most people are so startled by the very notion of it they refuse to believe or discuss it.

Go figure.

Best regards,

122 posted on 03/30/2008 6:42:17 PM PDT by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

my first thought. funny


123 posted on 03/30/2008 6:43:02 PM PDT by BIV (a republican is not properly called republic; a democrat is not properly called democratic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ol' hoghead
As a police officer, we also have the right to protect ourselves from the public. But if we remain focussed on what is written in this case, and if you are commenting on this situation, what suggests that the officer was threatened? If you see a car on the street, do you expect it be driven at you? Would you stop and frisk someone at a barbecue because they were holding a knife? How does the public measure an officer's fear, especially when minding one's own business?
124 posted on 03/30/2008 6:50:06 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Truthism Watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
I have a CCW in Ohio and I won’t carry in the open, it’s just asking for trouble.

Me too here in Michigan.

I was ripped a while back from one of your state homies when I said I wasn't about to openly carry just to prove that I had the right to do so..........

125 posted on 03/30/2008 6:52:33 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (According to Algorp, if I don't believe his lies then I believe the world is flat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

If you think he has trounced anyone in an argument you must be as deluded as he is.
Just because he keeps posting does not mean he has won anything.


126 posted on 03/30/2008 6:55:46 PM PDT by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

Nice try.
If you agree with paulsen then you and I will probably not agree on anything.
If you are refering that debating with me is not debating with an adult then I would say that you and I have not debated anything so you have no basis for that opinion.


127 posted on 03/30/2008 6:59:40 PM PDT by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
So basically you posted this to bash law enforcement officers. Golly you are cool.

So basically you posted that to bash law obeying citizens. Golly you are cool.

128 posted on 03/30/2008 7:02:56 PM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kempo

Try to keep up and stay focussed on the situation as have been presented.

But I do have a question for you. What is worse, a forum bad-ass or someone who becomes a bad-ass cop to excercise his inadequacies over people who cannot defend themselves on an equal footing?


129 posted on 03/30/2008 7:07:39 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Truthism Watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: smoketree

Then why are the ankle-biters cowering away from pinging him?


130 posted on 03/30/2008 7:18:55 PM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: smoketree
Nice try. If you agree with paulsen then you and I will probably not agree on anything. If you are refering that debating with me is not debating with an adult then I would say that you and I have not debated anything so you have no basis for that opinion.

???????

Even the name seems to bring everyone to a keen edge.

I think your comments (about he who cannot be named) were correct and I thought I chimed in with my agreement.

You are welcome to visit my forum links page to see some of my latest encounters.

Best regards,

131 posted on 03/30/2008 7:26:49 PM PDT by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: kempo
I'll go first!

Please, take me!!!

It's been soooo long since I've sparred with an unarmed man....take meeeee...

132 posted on 03/30/2008 7:27:02 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Then why are the ankle-biters cowering away from pinging him?

Because no one in their right mind invites ants to a picnic.

133 posted on 03/30/2008 7:31:40 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: basil

bump for open carry in Ky as well...


134 posted on 03/30/2008 7:37:19 PM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Choose Liberty over slavery... the gulag awaits ANY compromise with evil...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
It's common courtesy, not a rule. And anyone that tells you it is, is mistaken.

The way I see it, the disingenuous deserve no such courtesy, as they don't practice it themselves.

135 posted on 03/30/2008 7:43:42 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: ol' hoghead
As a police officer, we also have the right to protect ourselves from the public.

Typical worried about himself above EVERYONE else, rights-be-damned, US LEO.

I'm NOT impressed, slick.

136 posted on 03/30/2008 7:44:16 PM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Cowering??????????????????
Nobody’s cowering.
It’s more like avoiding quicksand.


137 posted on 03/30/2008 8:06:15 PM PDT by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

“About he who cannot be named”

That’s funny.

Perhaps I misunderstood you. Seems like everything around he who cannot be named gets confusing.


138 posted on 03/30/2008 8:10:26 PM PDT by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought
I hate heavy handed cops but they do have a right to defend themselves and confronting a stranger carry a firearm is serious business. As matter of fact it can and has been deadly business. You don't believe me? Try it sometimes. How long does it take for some one to turn and pull the trigger when the cop says “Excuse me sir”. The suspect may be a good guy and he may not be. Some on this forum think cops should be programed robots that make no mistakes. What a load of bull shit.
139 posted on 03/30/2008 8:12:03 PM PDT by kempo (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: kempo
Maybe you should find a 'safer' line of work...

You either violate someone's rights or your dead.

just remember that once you violate my rights, I may feel obligated to return the favor...or at least just turn the other cheek if I recognize you lying in your pool of blood from a real criminals weapon...

LFOD...

140 posted on 03/30/2008 8:12:50 PM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Choose Liberty over slavery... the gulag awaits ANY compromise with evil...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson