Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw

When I saw this yesterday I was a bit conflicted...for the sake of children, I don’t know if this is a good idea, although it was inevitable...and I think you’re right..the “unsure father” market will definitely be larger than the “unsure mother.” The question of the ages can be answered for under 40 bucks.


35 posted on 03/29/2008 10:26:14 PM PDT by Hildy (Obama: "Yes, I sat in his church, but I didn't inhale.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Hildy

Plus the “unsure father” can do the test easily and surreptitiously. All he needs is his cheek tissue sample and the baby’s. While his wife needs to get a sample from him and the baby. BUT-—>>> If wife had only one boyfriend in the time frame of conception then she could do the test on boyfriend and baby and learn something

Lets remember that part of the reason Jews are identified as Jews via their mother is that the bearer of the child is always identifiable as Jewish. While the man who impregnated her and gave half the DNA to the child might be in question. That’s how it always was until the DNA testing we have today


52 posted on 03/30/2008 3:43:58 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson