Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Islamic Response To Fitna Continues To Prove Film's Point
STEVELACKNER.COM ^ | March 29, 2008 | Steven W. Lackner

Posted on 03/29/2008 8:10:51 PM PDT by stevelackner

It seems the Islamic world will do anything to continue to prove the point that the Dutch parliamentarian was making with his new film "Fitna." The film showed a number of verses in the Koran interspersed with Islamic sermons, footage of terrorism, and Dutch newspaper headlines.

It started with liveleak.com, the first website to share the video, pulling the video from their website after only one day because of serious threats to their staff. As LiveLeak put it, "in the end the price was too high." So the response to a video showing an Islamic prediliction toward violence and terrorism is intimidation and violent threats.

A Jihadist website responded to the video by posting in Arabic that "if there is no check on the freedom of your words, then let your hearts be open to the freedom of our actions." This was along with a picture of Osama bin Laden and the World Trade Towers burning in the background. These words have been attributed to Bin Laden himself, his response in a more recently released tape to the famed Danish cartoons.

The Organization of the Islamic Conference added its voice to the criticism of the film released by the Dutch lawmaker. OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu condemned "in the strongest terms the release of the film 'Fitna' by Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders." This is their full right, to object if they so please. But, pray tell, would it not be more productive and appropriate if the OIC were condemning clearly, constantly, and loudly the throat slitters, head choppers, and suicide bombers that murder innocents, both Muslim and non-Muslim alike, in the name of Islam?

A militant believed linked to al-Qaida's deputy chief Ayman al-Zawahri, Qari Mohammed Yusuf, told The Associated Press last week that "foreigners will be attacked. The situation will change, change, change" because of the film. Whether this is true or not is yet to be seen, but that there is truth in the film that is being proven by the Jihadist response is undoubtable. Furthermore, hundreds of Islamists staged angry protests across Pakistan over the film. This may not seem like a lot, and it is a relatively small number compared to the response to the Danish cartoons, but it does not take many people to carry out Jihad operations. The Taliban has also threatened retaliation against Dutch troops in Afghanistan.

Now comes Omar Bakri, the Libyan-based Jihadist Muslim cleric who has been barred from Britain. He makes the exact point that "Fitna" itself was making in no uncertain terms. He says exactly what Wilders film itself meant to say. Bakri did not think the film was very offensive at all. He said, "On the contrary, if we leave out the first images and the sound of the page being torn, it could be a film by the Mujahideen."

The Human Rights Council has also gotten in on the action. The U.N. Human Rights Council, which is dominated by Arab and other Muslim countries, adopted a resolution Thursday in a 21-10 vote. It said the Council was concerned about the defamation of religions and urged governments to prohibit it. Interestingly, the only religion specified as being attacked is Islam, to which eight paragraphs refer. It is well known that the Human Rights Council is a joke, and this only goes to prove it. But the response of the Arab and Muslim dominated Council should not surprise anyone. And I raise the same objection I did earlier with the OIC. Condemnations of the film were also heard from the UN Secretary General who said "there is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence. The right of free expression is not at stake here.” Why is the right of free expression not at stake here? Is the right of free expression not at stake when Muslims sensitivities are offended? I saw the film and I personally saw no incitment to violence either. What I did see was a film depicting how the Islamic religion and its holy book are being used by the ones who are truly violent and hateful to justify their actions.

The response from the Islamic world was predictable. It is what we have come to know all too well. Empty condemnations of hate speech but hardly ever a condemnation against terrorism itself. There have also been threats and promises of violence, which we can only pray will not be fulfilled. No one has happened to be killed over this. But then again, that's why the Dutch lawmaker has a constant security detail. Al-Qaeda websites have already posted photos of Wilders with statements such saying, "The Dutch, enemy of Allah, has done what he threatened to do and distributed his film." Whether one fully agrees with the content of Wilder's film, or his politics, has become irrelevant at this point. The response of the Jihadis has shown us that the free world must be willing to stand up for his right to express himself and must end the cowtowing to Islamofascist intimidation.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; blogpimp; dutch; filmjihad; fitna; freedomofspeech; freespeech; globaljihad; islam; islamofascism; jihad; religionofpeace; wilders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 03/29/2008 8:10:53 PM PDT by stevelackner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stevelackner

Good post. Welcome to FR.


2 posted on 03/29/2008 8:12:33 PM PDT by jdm (Sign you've got a crappy job: your boss asks if you're on MySpace and if you'll add him as a friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevelackner
Geert Wilders' film is controversial only because it depicts Islamists using their own justifications for jihad. They just dislike being depicted for who they actually are - not that they disagree with the film's portrayal of them and their agenda.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 03/29/2008 8:13:13 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; SJackson; wagglebee; ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; SandRat; Alouette

The Religion Of Peace strikes again!


4 posted on 03/29/2008 8:14:07 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Those in the national Republican leadership do the work of three men- Moe, Larry, and Curly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Watch the movie and link it to everybody. These mooselimbs must be defeated. It is nothing but a false cult of death. It is heretical. Never forget. NEVER FORGET!!!!!!!!!!


5 posted on 03/29/2008 8:18:13 PM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shankbear

There were a lot of video segments in the film that had dropped off the world radar. It’s nice to see them back.


6 posted on 03/29/2008 8:21:19 PM PDT by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stevelackner
Omar Bakri, the Libyan-based Cleric... said, "...if we leave out the first images and the sound of the page being torn, it could be a film by the Mujahideen."

Bingo!

7 posted on 03/29/2008 8:21:20 PM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: stevelackner
Image hosted by Photobucket.com don't laugh at me... I KILL YOU!!!
9 posted on 03/29/2008 8:22:50 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Shine a light and the cockroaches run for cover. For jihadists, I live in Colorado. I can give you 79 Virginians.


10 posted on 03/29/2008 8:24:19 PM PDT by MtnClimber (Not liking my choices in this election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Exactly! And if this film is not representative of Islam, why aren't we hearing mainstream Muslims denounce the extremists who commit atrocities in the name of Islam instead of trying to shut down Wilders? As Wilders said, Islam needs to clean up its own house. And as long as Muslims applaud and tolerate those who commit terrorism and violence in the name of their religion, Wilders' criticisms will continue to resonate with non-Muslims the world over.

Our message to Islamofascists is that we will never submit to becoming dhmmis and we will never pay the jiyza again. If their terms are for us to give our religious beliefs and our freedom, they will face a fight to the end of the world.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

11 posted on 03/29/2008 8:27:13 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stevelackner

Muslims should be educated to the fact that the West values freedom over Islamic dogma.


12 posted on 03/29/2008 8:27:31 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevelackner
Welcome to FR. I doubt that other countries—the EU countries included—have something like the 1st Amendment.
13 posted on 03/29/2008 8:28:25 PM PDT by paudio (Michelle Obama: a Typical Black Woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode
Image hosted by Photobucket.comdon't laugh at me... I KILL YOU!!!

14 posted on 03/29/2008 8:28:57 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

BTTT


15 posted on 03/29/2008 8:29:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stevelackner

D-E-P-O-R-T


16 posted on 03/29/2008 8:30:40 PM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben, reports to Parris Island on June 30.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I live in Texas and you jihadist wussy pig humpers come on down. You will be fed to the fire.


17 posted on 03/29/2008 8:32:10 PM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chode

every time i watch that achmed video, i laugh my butt off. don’t forget to google “jingle bombs” on youtube for another laugh. :)


18 posted on 03/29/2008 8:35:26 PM PDT by robomatik ((wine plug: renascentvineyards.com cabernet sauvignon, riesling, and merlot))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stevelackner

19 posted on 03/29/2008 8:36:48 PM PDT by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The UN should never take a stand against truth and start to uphold lies. This matter should be taken to court to decide what is true. Islam is not the truth, and it can be proven.


20 posted on 03/29/2008 8:40:37 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson