Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot

See paragraph 4 of post #167.

Gads you are dense. I’ve already surrendered on that point.

You OTOH, are still arguing that loans are less that deposits, yet you cite an example where even the most casual take shows that $100 of new money yields a total of $357 in loans. Further you biased your selection by selecting an example at 20% reserves, while ignoring the 10% chart when throughout this entire thread we’ve agreed on the reserve requirement being 10%.

My math skills show me that even at 20% reserves $357 is more than $100. What do yours show you?

Just as a reminder the chart at the same source, the one you are so studiously ignoring, has a 10% reserve requirements line that shows an initial $100 deposit allows banks to create $860 in new money.

I think $860 is more than $100. What do you think?

You’ve said the banks can only loan out $90 on that $100. I think +$860 is more than -$10. Do you agree?


171 posted on 04/02/2008 8:19:15 PM PDT by null and void (It's 3 AM, do you know where Hillary is? Does she know where Bill is? Does Bill know what 'is' is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Applause

;-)


172 posted on 04/02/2008 8:23:52 PM PDT by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

*snicker*


173 posted on 04/02/2008 8:38:14 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
You OTOH, are still arguing that loans are less that deposits,

Yes, loans are less than deposits.

where even the most casual take shows that $100 of new money yields a total of $357 in loans.

Yes, $357 in loans from $457 in deposits.

Further you biased your selection by selecting an example at 20% reserves,

I simply copied the example from Pelham's link.

My math skills show me that even at 20% reserves $357 is more than $100. What do yours show you?

My skills show that $357 is less than $457.

Just as a reminder the chart at the same source, the one you are so studiously ignoring, has a 10% reserve requirements line that shows an initial $100 deposit allows banks to create $860 in new money.

The formula is m=1/r. So if carried to the end, $100 in new money is loaned and redeposited until you have $1000 in deposits, $900 in loans and $100 in reserves.

You should notice that $900 is still less than $1000.

You’ve said the banks can only loan out $90 on that $100.

And I'm absolutely correct.

Gads you are dense. I’ve already surrendered on that point.

Finally. Banks cannot "create" money out of thin air. $10,000 in the vault does not allow $100,000 in loans to materialize because checks are "good as cash".

174 posted on 04/02/2008 8:38:28 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are doom and gloomers (and liberals) so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
This is an oldie but a goody.

Still stand behind your bad math?

241 posted on 10/25/2009 1:10:51 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Is your math still this bad? LOL!


243 posted on 09/26/2010 9:15:07 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson