“Complex.” The favorite liberal word for obfuscating the obvious.
Or, “Hey. It’s not a matter of black and white, or good and evil, or right and wrong. It’s shades of gray. It’s too complex for you dummies to understand.”
Yep, a favorite obfuscation, like you say. Too bad the defining characteristic of his schtick was omitted -- that would be marxism. It's not even nuanced. His whole diatribe with Hannity was over his (Wright's) intimate knowledge of his aberrant, liberation "theology" and Sean's ignorance of it. Hannity should have said, "Sorry. I haven't got time to read America-hating, communist books."
What are you going to believe? What you hear? This is very dangerous. You really should wait for the nuances and complexities of these circumstances to be explained. Only then, will you think correctly about these sensitive and complex issues. Given sufficient explanation, learning to hate your country, and yourself, will follow in due time.
““Complex.” T”he favorite liberal word for obfuscating the obvious.”
Another favorite is “nuanced”
complex? Whatever happened to nuanced?
Your own question to me was, Didn’t I think it would be incredible to have somebody in the Oval Office who not only knew about Muslims, but had living and breathing Muslims in his own family?
I told you how important it would be to have a man who not only knew the difference between Shiites and Sunnis prior to 9/11/01 in the Oval Office, but also how important it would be to have a man who knew what Sufism was...
.
re: “complex”
Ah, I’ll bet you don’t understand “nuance” either! :^)