Replies

My FRiend, I think that almost all Democrats win and have won by fraud for years. They have to cheat to win, and that includes cheating in order to get their policies implemented. For example, they can't win at the ballot box on social issues so they use the judiciary to override that. Here's the deal: Obama or Hillary may SAY and THREATEN/PROMISE to do things like Universal Health Care, Liberal SCOTUS appointments, etc., but their support is illusion and they will have plenty of people fighting them on their own side to prevent them from inflicting damage. McCain, on the other hand, would do the same things, the media would call him courageous, timid frightened Republicans would cower in support, and Democrats would be shielded from the blame when the policies ultimately screw up. As for the Muslim threat, it is LIBERALISM in nations aroudn the world that has lead to Sharia Creep, and McCain IS A LIBERAL. More people would try to stop Obama than would try to stop McCain from doing things to further Sharia Creep.

As for thinking that rejecting McCain is like "cutting off yoru nose to spite your face," RIGHT BACK AT YA. Willfully empowering John McCain to represent the Republican party is cutting off the Republican party's nose to spite its face. It would be worse than an empty meaningless victory -- it would be a victory detrimental to Republicans.

Your mother also probably told you often enough that you had to drink icky cough syrup today if you wanted to feel better tomorrow, otherwise tomorrow you'll feel WORSE. Better to swallow bitter medicine now -- aka, let the Dems have the next four years and watch them as they implode, as they will -- and understand that bitter medicine is often necesasary to lead to better health further down the road.

I remember when voting for Perot was that bitter medicine that was supposed to do it for us Finny.

Finny - Ditter is just lashing out in anger and projecting his frustration onto those who do not want to lick McCain’s boots. Take it easy on him.