Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SErtelt

I’m not keen on Planned Parenthood, of course, but the term “profit” seems to be completely inaccurate. It sounds to me that the real *profit* is described in THIS sentence:

“Planned Parenthood reveals it has doubled “excess of revenue over expenses” funds from $55.7 million in 2005 to $112 million in 2006.”

An excess of revenue over expenses is technically a profit.

The $1 billion figure sounds like REVENUES which makes this article laughably inaccurate and ignorant. That does NOT help the cause.


10 posted on 03/28/2008 12:53:34 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bolobaby

I was going to say the exact same thing.........but glad there’s someone else out there using their noggin.


17 posted on 03/28/2008 12:59:13 PM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: bolobaby; Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
bolobaby is correct, this article is inaccurate.

Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor does the Lord's work but sometimes he gets sloppy.

The real bottom line is that Planned Parenthood kills babies for profit; and as thier very founder regularly stated to keep the undesirables and non white populations as low as possible. There is not one single good or decent thing they do. If it was not profitable they would close in a second. They are evil, pure and simple.

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

48 posted on 03/28/2008 5:22:17 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson