Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi militia success means Britain must fight – or admit failure ( Times of London Headline)
Times -UK ^ | March 28, 2008 | Richard Beeston, Foreign Editor

Posted on 03/28/2008 12:29:32 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

The battle for Basra now raging on the streets of Iraq’s second city shows every sign of turning into a nightmare for the dwindling British forces based near by.

For months Britain has been quietly reducing its presence in Iraq with the intention of pulling out altogether. First it withdrew last September from the Basra Palace base in the city centre and moved its forces to the airport. Then it changed its tactical role to “overwatch”, a vague term for supporting the Iraqi security forces nominally in control of the port city.

The intention was to withdraw British forces from frontline duties and concentrate on training Iraqis and offering support when needed. But the problem from the outset has been the failure of the Iraqi army and police to take control of the city, a mission that British troops, with the advantage of modern equipment and training, had failed to do during their four years in southern Iraq. Instead the Shia Muslim militias — the Mahdi Army loyal to Moqtadr al-Sadr, the Badr Brigades of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq and the smaller Fadillah Party — effectively took over the streets.

The three groups were in open contest for control of the city. The battle has little to do with ideology but everything to do with economics. Basra is the hub of Iraq’s valuable oil industry and the militias are making millions by taking their cut of the exports.

The problem now facing the British is how to respond to the fast-changing situation.

Nuri al-Maliki, the Iraqi Prime Minister, who flew to Basra to take personal control, said that his forces would fight “to the end” against the militias. Unfortunately for him, the end may come sooner than he expected. The Iraqi Army contingent of 30,000 troops has failed to dislodge the Mahdi Army, there are widespread reports of defections from the police to the militias and there are clear signs that the operation could backfire badly.

British forces, who can probably cobble together an armoured battle group of a few hundred soldiers, may well be asked to intervene should the Iraqi offensive fail. If that happens, any hope of the withdrawal promised by Gordon Brown last year of another 1,500 British troops this spring will have to be shelved until Basra can be stabilised.

It may even be necessary to reinforce the British contingent with more combat troops, something that the Ministry of Defence can ill afford as it prepares for the fighting season in Afghanistan.

The only other option would be for Britain to admit finally that it has lost the fight in southern Iraq. That would mean an ignominious withdrawal and handing over control of Basra to the Americans, who grudgingly would have to take over responsibility for the south. As American officers and officials have privately made clear, much of today’s problems in Basra can be traced back to Britain’s failure to commit the forces necessary to control Basra and southern Iraq in general.

Whereas President Bush’s “surge” tactic of sending 30,000 reinforcements to central Iraq has succeeded in bringing down the level of violence in Baghdad and Anbar province, the Americans believe that the gradual withdrawal of British troops from the south has had the opposite effect, a point that Mr al-Maliki and his soldiers are discovering to their cost on the streets of Basra today.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: basra; england; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks for all the links. Very interesting info.


41 posted on 03/28/2008 4:25:17 PM PDT by uksupport1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: uksupport1

>whole areas seized by Shiite militias in recent days...

You have a problem with reality.
Stop reading those UK rags.


42 posted on 03/28/2008 5:08:08 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

I take no pride in pointing out errors my friend. Especially from a country that I consider one of three countries that the US could count on in a moment’s notice. But I cannot hide my disappointment at a weak horse strategy that was doomed to failure.


43 posted on 03/28/2008 10:40:16 PM PDT by steel_resolve (I stand with the Tibetans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Have you been seized?

Use the secret hand signal if they’re making you talk.

All hail our new ant overlords.

(Frint page news, “Iraq Is Lost” until the truth smacks the libs in the face, then the retraction will be on page 39 F in microscopic type.)


44 posted on 03/28/2008 11:58:21 PM PDT by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson