Skip to comments.
Limbaugh safe from voter-fraud charges
The Columbus Dispatch ^
| Friday, March 28, 2008
| Mark Niquette
Posted on 03/28/2008 8:52:43 AM PDT by LoneStarGI
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: LoneStarGI
2
posted on
03/28/2008 8:54:07 AM PDT
by
michigander
(When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: LoneStarGI
"We have no intention of prosecuting Rush Limbaugh because lying through your teeth and being stupid isn't a crime," said Leo Jennings, a spokesman for Democratic Attorney General Marc Dann. Good thing, too ... else the prisons would be overflowing with liberals.
3
posted on
03/28/2008 8:54:24 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Election 2008: Now the evil of two lessers.)
To: LoneStarGI
there are Duers across the country pulling out their hair over this..........
4
posted on
03/28/2008 8:54:36 AM PDT
by
tioga
To: tioga
5
posted on
03/28/2008 8:55:04 AM PDT
by
tioga
To: LoneStarGI
[Limbaugh:]"I had the temerity, ladies and gentlemen, to tinker with a tradition, a liberal Democrat tradition: voter manipulation."
Exquisite!
6
posted on
03/28/2008 8:55:12 AM PDT
by
alecqss
To: michigander
yeah for my hero. love ya RUSH
To: Colonel_Flagg
Nah, no libs would ever be pursued for the same “violation”.
Just like no “black” churches will ever be investigated for tax exemption violations.
8
posted on
03/28/2008 8:55:49 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: LoneStarGI
Rush was praying they would indict him. The publicity would have been priceless.
9
posted on
03/28/2008 8:56:01 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(<===Typical White American)
To: LoneStarGI
In Ohio, party-switchers are supposed to sign a form attesting, under penalty of election falsification -- a felony -- that they support the principles of the party whose ballot they are obtaining. Does this mean that there are NO RINOs in Ohio?
10
posted on
03/28/2008 8:56:22 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Famous moments in history: March 18th, 2008 “I have a bridge (to sell you)...” - Barack H. Obama)
To: tioga
I read a couple of left wing message boards where the people literally were overjoyed at the thought of Rush being charged over this; didn’t seem to matter to them that a few honest people at the message boards pointed out that the Daily Kos people were doing this way back to McCain.
11
posted on
03/28/2008 8:56:27 AM PDT
by
HD1200
To: Colonel_Flagg
I’m surprised that Rush hasn’t received the Profiles in courage Award by from the kennedy’s. After all lying is the means by which things get done in liberal land.
To: LoneStarGI
In Ohio, party-switchers are supposed to sign a form attesting, ... that they support the principles of the party whose ballot they are obtaining. Isn't that also known as a "loyalty oath"?
13
posted on
03/28/2008 8:56:45 AM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
To: tioga
14
posted on
03/28/2008 8:57:05 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Famous moments in history: March 18th, 2008 “I have a bridge (to sell you)...” - Barack H. Obama)
To: PJ-Comix
Quick! Quick! If this doesn’t occasion a thread over on the DU site worthy of a DUmmie FUnnies for tomorrow... then: nothing EVER will! ;)
15
posted on
03/28/2008 8:58:15 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("John McCain is to conservatism what Cindy Sheehan is to the Miss Universe Pageant.")
To: tioga
The guys calling us Nazis see no problem with requiring a loyalty oath to vote in a party’s campaign primary, and sending people to prison for breaking it.
16
posted on
03/28/2008 8:58:18 AM PDT
by
Richard Kimball
(Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
To: LoneStarGI
Grrrrrrrrrrr... you are an idiot Limbaugh, you are so stupid for starting this entire thing. It will never work and I hate you for it. We had nothing to do with John McCain being nominated for your party...
aside from the New York Times, Washington Post, and other newspapers siding with him...
aside from so many of the most liberal Republicans siding with him...
aside from the Governator of California siding with him (great conservative by the way~!)...
Aside from having CNN, MSNBC, and ABC all proclaim he should be the nominee...
Of COURSE we had nothing to do with him being nominated! The American people all wanted him.</sarcasm>
17
posted on
03/28/2008 9:00:35 AM PDT
by
MadDoctorD
(Thumpin' liberal stupidity since 1988!)
To: Richard Kimball
do they have a kool-aid test?
18
posted on
03/28/2008 9:01:21 AM PDT
by
tioga
To: LoneStarGI
Rush has carried this Operation Chaos to an extreme but when it comes down to it, all’s fair in love, war, and politics. After all, it was the liberals who gave us McCain as the GOP nominee. Nice to see them get some payback.
19
posted on
03/28/2008 9:02:13 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
To: LoneStarGI
“We have no intention of prosecuting Rush Limbaugh because lying through your teeth and being stupid isn’t a crime,” said Leo Jennings, a spokesman for Democratic Attorney General Marc Dann.
Good thing Democrats are totally non-partisan and believe in elevating discourse.
This guy should get some calls and e-mails about “hate speech.”
20
posted on
03/28/2008 9:02:57 AM PDT
by
Tex Pete
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
