Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Whitewater Proxy
The Wall Street Journal ^ | March 28, 2008 | KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL

Posted on 03/27/2008 8:07:07 PM PDT by Aristotelian

Hillary Clinton's been all the news this week, after she "misspoke" about Whitewater, Travelgate, missing files, suspicious pardons, Johnny Chung and cattle futures. Oh wait, after she "misspoke" about Bosnia. Oh wait, same thing.

That's one way to make sense of the unrelenting, unforgiving, 24/7 news coverage of Mrs. Clinton's fictional telling of Bosnian sniper fire and the subsequent debunking of her every word. In a nasty primary battle that has already featured racial slurs and Chicago slum lords, missing tax documents, and a "monster," you might expect this slip-up to have been yet another blip in the media cycle.

But that would have been to deny the press, the pundits, Democrats, and even Barack Obama, the catharsis of finally -- finally! -- getting a chance to confront the Clintons' questionable mores. Hillary's and Bill's scandals have been the elephant in the primary room ever since she first signaled a run. Yet up to now everyone has been too scared, or too loyal, or too weary to touch the ugly past. Her Bosnia misspeak is now serving as proxy for all the truths about the Clintons' non-truths, allowing even liberals to break free from their Clinton dependence.

And how liberating it is! The video of Mrs. Clinton's speech about Bosnian sniper fire, twinned with real footage of calmly strolling down the Tuzla tarmac, has been running on one continuous TV loop. Reporters have dug up every last person who accompanied her on the sedate trip to pour a little more salt in the wound.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; x42
Poetic justice.
1 posted on 03/27/2008 8:07:07 PM PDT by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
No need to mention Vince Foster, Red Bone, Marc Rich or Webster Hubbell.

Red Bone? I must have missed that one ... I don't recall :)

2 posted on 03/27/2008 8:17:11 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
When it comes to Clinton mega scandals, it's more like a rampaging herd of elephants.

It is a relief to see that the genie's bottle has been opened up on the Clintons. The press maybe starting to peel off layers of protective veneer to finally expose their scaly and grimey prolific perfidious swindling and corruption.

3 posted on 03/27/2008 8:18:55 PM PDT by harpo11 (Rush, had better have a back-up strategy just in case the third term grabbing Clintons win the WH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Re Red Bone:

Hillary Clinton Futures Trades Detailed
By Charles R. Babcock
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 27, 1994; Page A01

A close examination of her individual trades underscores Blair’s pivotal role. It also shows that Robert L. “Red” Bone, who ran the Springdale, Ark., office of Ray E. Friedman and Co. (Refco), allowed Clinton to initiate and maintain many trading positions – besides the first – when she did not have enough money in her account to cover them.

Why would Bone do so? Bone could not be reached for comment, but Blair said he thought he knew why. “I was a very good customer,” he said, noting he paid Bone $800,000 in commissions over the years. “They weren’t going to hassle me. If I brought them somebody, they weren’t going to hassle them.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/stories/wwtr940527.htm


4 posted on 03/27/2008 8:21:34 PM PDT by Aristotelian ("I have a million ideas. The country can't afford them all." Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
[Yet up to now everyone has been too scared, or too loyal, or too weary to touch the ugly past.]

Try too partisan. The news media is 95 percent liberal Democrat. They don't report news, they produce partisan propaganda. They would still be promoting the Clintons if someone fancier, Obama, hadn't taken the stage. “Poetic justice” is right. But so is “arrested development” which describes the adolescent ignorance and arrogance of what passes today for the Press.

5 posted on 03/27/2008 8:24:56 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

There was a disgusting man on Glenn Beck’s show the other night—some so-called “journalist” or something to do with the newsmedia. He kept insisting that “politicians exaggerate—all of them do”. The significance of lying was obviously lost on him. He exemplified the “Mainstream Newsmedia” and why decent people hold it and its so-called “journalists” in such contempt.


6 posted on 03/27/2008 8:34:53 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

Thing is, it wasn’t an exaggeration; it was a fabrication.


7 posted on 03/27/2008 8:37:01 PM PDT by Aristotelian ("I have a million ideas. The country can't afford them all." Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

John Huang too ~ don’t forget him. Then there’s Gilbert Colon.


8 posted on 03/27/2008 8:38:52 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: red flanker

Ready To Mislead On Day One...

9 posted on 03/27/2008 8:41:29 PM PDT by red flanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Yes. I know it was a fabrication. You know it was a fabrication. Every honest person knows it was a fabrication--and acknowledges this. The point is that the so-called "journalist" kept insisting that it was an exaggeration. Evidently he doesn't recognize the difference between lying and exaggerating--which goes to the heart of the reason that decent people hold the "Mainstream Newsmedia" and its so-called "journalists" in such utter contempt: They hold truth itself in utter contempt--which is utterly contemptible, especially in those whose responsibility it is to inform and to be bearers of truth.
10 posted on 03/27/2008 8:54:03 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Great tagline. It will soon be obsolete.


11 posted on 03/27/2008 9:09:50 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

“No need to mention Vince Foster, Red Bone, Marc Rich or Webster Hubbell”

We used to play a game called Geography where somebody named a place, the next person named a place beginning with the last letter of the previous place - Arkansas, San Diego, Oregon, etc.

You could do that with the Clinton scandals. Vince Foster, Rose law firm, Monica, Arkansas prison blood, Dale (Billy), Espy (Mike), Yeakey (Terry), Yvette Fagan (died at Waco), (Bernard) Nussbaum, (Susan) McDonald, Dick Morris, (Kenneth) Starr, Ron Brown, etc.


12 posted on 03/27/2008 9:35:33 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tymesup

You forgot McDougal. Dead of course.


13 posted on 03/28/2008 5:59:00 AM PDT by 70th Division (If we loose the Republic we have lost it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division

Jim McDougal died in 1998, as you noted. Susan McDougal, who I misremembered as McDonald above, is one of the few people who did time as a result of Whitewater. I didn’t know Susan had separated from Jim. I also didn’t know she received a full pardon from Bill Clinton.


14 posted on 03/28/2008 11:13:04 AM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Great commentary.
I had forgotten the vast wasteland of Clintonian scandals.


15 posted on 03/28/2008 11:23:34 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
"Which is why it is no surprise that this week also saw the beginning of a tide of Democrats, many of them one-time Clinton defenders, calling on her to abandon her bid, laying out the reasons for why she cannot win this race, and telling her to let go for the good of the party. Mrs. Clinton, being a Clinton, may well ignore them. But what is clear is that questions about her character and honesty are no longer verboten. If she does stay in, answering them will become the new reality of her campaign."

That was a happy ending! I have seen defections and rebukes, like Pelosi resisting the Clinton donor's strong arm letter, as never before. If she goes far enough she may finish herself.

16 posted on 03/28/2008 7:10:58 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson