Yes, it does. You came in here both barrels blazing, now finish it. He has paid for his previous visits with his daughter so it wasn’t at taxpayer expense, has minimal time left to serve and has said he will double his time left to serve so he can be with her when she passes. He will not get off with less time served and may have ended up with more than sentenced and is not costing the tax payers any more money than the inital incarceration. He is with her when she passes, goes back to finish his sentence, maybe even longer and costs no more than expected. What the hell is your problem with this?
Thanks for your excellent summary of this case so far...it is appreciated..
As for me, I have no problem, with this father being allowed to be with his daughter when she passes...
The sentence is the sentence.
It’s mean and awful, yes.
And perhaps, just maybe, it’ll prompt the next lowlife to think, “Hey, maybe I could never see my kids again, and that’d suck.”
You came in here both barrels blazing, now finish it. The illegal has paid for his previous visits here with his kids so it wasn’t at taxpayer expense, he only plans to be until his kids are established and has said he will work very hard and at slave wages so he can be with his kids and give them a chance at a better life. He always pays his own way is not costing the tax payers any money.
What the hell is your problem with this?