Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene
BTW, for a little more background, we had a story about the letters HERE. Hard to believe that a civilian SecNavy would override Gen Mattis and censure Marine officers by saying they had "betrayed the trust" of the Corps.

If this story is true, how could Mattis let this happen?

61 posted on 03/26/2008 7:18:23 PM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: RedRover

Well, Sec. Navy was responsible for issuing the letters, so I would guess he would have the final say. According to the Thomas More Law article, it alleges that only Col. Davis was to receive a Non-Punitive Letter of Caution vs. the Letter of Censure that he was actually given. It doesn’ mention what they think Gen. Mattis recommended for the other two.

Still it is VERY curious why these Letters of Censure were made public. That alone was “to shape public perception”. It would help if someone would go on record to deny or confirm this allegation.


62 posted on 03/26/2008 7:34:21 PM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson