Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker

I think you are underestimating the extent of our dependence on the government. Everyone receives benefit from the government, either directly or indirectly.

I live in a western state where a lot of people have the idea they are rugged individualists not dependent on the government. But they grow crops irrigated by government irrigation systems drawing water provided by government dams. Their electricity is provided by government cooperatives. Ranchers have their cattle roaming on government land, while loggers cut trees in government forests. And that’s not even counting the government roads and highways we drive on, the government hospitals we go to when we’re sick or injured, and the government fire, police and ambulance services we depend on.

Let’s face it, our ideas are just utopian dreams that will probably never be implemented.


44 posted on 03/26/2008 2:57:24 PM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: FFranco

Well, everyone SHOULD be receiving benefits from the government INdirectly. If it weren’t so, we should completely shut down the government forthwith. But those who are using government to transfer money and/or property from others to themselves shouldn’t have a vote. And yes, that includes a lot of people who don’t think of themselves as living on government/taxpayer handouts, including everyone who has children in public schools without paying the full tab in taxes every year (about $15,000 per child on average, and a lot higher in some areas).


47 posted on 03/27/2008 12:04:26 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson