I am really sick of Michelle Obama's whining.
To: freespirited
I am shocked (but not judging) their giving contributions, I guess it is true that conservatives give more than liberals. I guess they expect the government to tithe for them.
To: freespirited
She should have gone to UMSL, her loans would have been much smaller.
3 posted on
03/26/2008 7:27:56 AM PDT by
steve8714
(The poor you have always with you-unless you abort them out of existence.)
To: freespirited
Does anyone know if either of these two had to pay for the initial four years of school, or if they qualifed for free tuition under FAFSA?
To: freespirited
But now we see that the Obamas managed to scrape by in the years before that, as well. The returns show them with an adjusted gross income of $207,647 in 2004, the year Barack Obama spent running for the Senate. Their adjusted gross income was $238,327 in 2003. It was $259,394 in 2002; $272,759 in 2001; and $240,505 in 2000
I wish I could be as oppressed as these two.
7 posted on
03/26/2008 7:38:09 AM PDT by
The Lumster
(USA - where the innocent have nothing to fear!)
To: freespirited
Has she been kept out of the limelight of late, under wraps? I don’t recall seeing ANYTHING that she’s said or done the last month or so...wonder wjy?
8 posted on
03/26/2008 7:43:06 AM PDT by
ken5050
To: freespirited
To paraphrase Burgess Meredith (from some '60s war flick), "She needs a zipper in her face!"
11 posted on
03/26/2008 7:51:51 AM PDT by
LIConFem
(Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
To: freespirited
I like the part about the women “nodding in agreement” as if they too, on $30,000 a year are spending $10,000 on sports and other extra-curricular activities.
This just in. Kids aren’t cheap. But these parents that are spending thousands of dollars just so they don’t have to personally deal with the kids make me sick.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson