Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“So this means a restoration of a free Tibet will almost have to involve the expulsion of the Han Chinese already there.”

The Han Chinese were resettled in Tibet by the ChiCom regime much against the wishes of the Tibetians and, in some cases, the Hans themselves. You ought to be ashamed of using an ethic cleansing argument when it comes to the Han Chinese - who are by far the current experts in all forms of genocide.

Welcome to FR, btw.


26 posted on 03/26/2008 6:54:44 AM PDT by indcons (The civilized world must boycott the 2008 Genocide Olympics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: indcons

Potato, Potahto. You agree that the Han Chinese have to go, yet there is no nice way of getting them to go.

Please note that *I* didn’t call it “ethnic cleansing”, which I might add was an instantly trite expression. But yes, civilians will have to pay the price for the actions of their leaders.

I just do not see any nice way for the Tibetans to get the Han Chinese to leave Tibet, assuming the Chinese military leaves. It would probably be best if it was an orderly withdrawl, but that is seldom the case in the real world.

The same applies to the Uighur region of West China, or as was just a small mention in the news yesterday, the Chinese plainclothesmen leaving Nepal, where they have been sent to fight Tibetans.

In the future, it also seems likely that China and India will get into another brawl. Things happen.


27 posted on 03/26/2008 8:24:22 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson