Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPJ

>>Wrong again - turns out more guns mean LESS crime. The problem isn’t guns, it’s who has the guns.<<

We are on the same page with your first sentence. But I was, in fact, referring to “who has the guns” but trying to be breif. That is, when I was typing, I was thinking of searches in “the projects” and high gang activity neighborhoods. It IS about who has the guns, as you say.


233 posted on 03/25/2008 7:25:18 AM PDT by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy
People in projects need guns to defend themselves - often against thuggy neighbors. They have bars on the windows to protect themselves too. Both are good.

Guns keep crime down. Innocent people don't have to be victims of thugs when they own a gun. - -

Some lowlife breaks into your home and threatens you and you can sweetly, legally, blow his brains out.

It's not guns that cause crime - criminals that cause crime. Want less crime? Have fewer criminals.

235 posted on 03/25/2008 9:39:32 AM PDT by GOPJ (Remember your ABC's -- Anybody But Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson