Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Soviet president Gorbachev slams US anti-missile plans in eastern Europe
hemscott.com ^ | 03/24/08

Posted on 03/24/2008 9:31:43 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

PRAGUE (Thomson Financial) - Former Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev attacked US plans to site an anti-missile system in central and eastern Europe, saying that it was aimed at Russia and China and not Iran.

'You believe that (the system) will be used against Iran? No, the whole system is aimed against Russia and China,' Gorbachev said in an interview broadcast by Czech public television today.

He dismissed sustained US statements that the anti-missile system is aimed exclusively at countering the threat from 'rogue states' such as Iran.

'The US radar is a serious question and the Czech government has been preparing to accept it for a long time without a mandate from its own citizens. You think this is being prepared against Iran? That is total nonsense. Iran does not present any threat. It would be possible to settle things with it in another way if that was really required,' Gorbachev said.

Gorbachev's comments echo Moscow's repeated assertions that US plans to site a radar in the Czech Republic and interceptor missiles in neighbouring Poland represent a direct threat to Russia.

Appearing on the same programme, former Czech president and dissident icon Vaclav Havel defended the US plans and attacked local anti-radar protesters.

'The US for the first time is asking for something from us. Frequently in the past we have made demands on it. They are asking for something small from us and we are prevaricating,' Havel said.

Anti-radar militants 'are doing something just as dangerous as pacifists before Munich,' Havel added, referring to the 1938 agreement between Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, Britain and France, under which large parts of former Czechoslovakia were handed over to Germany and later dismantled altogether.

The centre-right Czech government of Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek hopes to complete bilateral negotiations on the radar system with Washington before a NATO summit in Bucharest next week.

Parliament must approve any deal. The government has refused to hold a referendum on the issue, with a succession of polls showing as many as two-thirds of Czechs opposed to a foreign base on their territory.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; coldwar2; communsim; czechrepublic; easterneurope; gorbachev; iran; missiledefense; nato; poland; premierputin; putin; russia; sovietunion; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2008 9:31:43 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

How, exactly, would Mr. Gorbachev like to explain how defensive missiles are “aimed” at anyone?


2 posted on 03/24/2008 9:32:42 AM PDT by PeterFinn (I am not voting for McCain. No way, no how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Thank you Mr. Gorbachev.

Your objection has been duly noted and recorded.

In the future, please make such objections in writing...

THEY’RE SO MUCH EASIER TO IGNORE THAT WAY!


3 posted on 03/24/2008 9:35:43 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The Left has long had a big problem with purely defensive weapons. ....moreso than even with ICBMs, it seems. Just more evidence of their collective mental disorder.


4 posted on 03/24/2008 9:36:59 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

That’s some good old aparachtick paranoia for you.


5 posted on 03/24/2008 9:37:03 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

‘The US radar is a serious question and the Czech government has been preparing to accept it for a long time without a mandate from its own citizens”

Did the Soviet Union EVER give a rats ass about what it’s own citizens wanted or cared about. Go polish your bust of Stalin and shut up !


6 posted on 03/24/2008 9:41:54 AM PDT by Veeram ("Any fool (Liberal) can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." ---Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Pacifism is a Christian heresy. So wrote Willmoore Kendall, one of the mavericks of the 50s conservatives, in The Conservative Affirmation in America.
7 posted on 03/24/2008 9:43:03 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornelis

Former ‘President’? How about the last Soviet dictator (not to be confused with the current dictator).


8 posted on 03/24/2008 9:45:02 AM PDT by CT (Conservative in hibernation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

“how defensive missiles are “aimed” at anyone?”

THANK YOU!!!!


9 posted on 03/24/2008 9:46:39 AM PDT by RedRightReturn (Do you know how to catch wild pigs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Okay. Well, how does this soviet propaganda sit with his visit to Assisi last week and articles about his being a devout Christian? Iran not a threat?? I guess if the Iranian people take I’m-a-nut-job down themselves, they could possibly reverse their stance as a threat...


10 posted on 03/24/2008 9:46:58 AM PDT by GOP_Thug_Mom (libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Mutually Assured Destruction becomes a worthless if one side can avoid destruction.

We are basically telling the Russians “Trust Us - We won’t attack you.” What if the tables were turned and they (or Iran or NK) were building a Missile Shield?

And as Reagan famously said “Trust - but verify.”

Anyway, considering we have a greater chance of a suitcase bomb going off as opposed to a missile strike, this is a waste of Taxpayer dollars.


11 posted on 03/24/2008 9:48:17 AM PDT by Philly Nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The fact that Russia is so uneasy about anti-missile missiles is proof enough that we need to double their number.

When the Czechs start basing offensive missiles in numbers beyond any defensive need, then Russia may have a point. To object to a missile defense system, which can defend against incoming missiles only, exposes a guilty conscience.


12 posted on 03/24/2008 9:53:24 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

“Iran does not present any threat.”

Wow, Gorby’s been hanging out with the anti-war kooks.


13 posted on 03/24/2008 9:56:10 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
The Left has long had a big problem with purely defensive weapons.

So true. This mental problem extends to defensive use of firearms as well.

14 posted on 03/24/2008 10:05:16 AM PDT by Hazwaste (Vote! Vote for the conservative local, state, and national candidates of your choice, but VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Philly Nomad
Anyway, considering we have a greater chance of a suitcase bomb going off as opposed to a missile strike, this is a waste of Taxpayer dollars.

How does one go about determining that the chance of one is greater than the chance of the other?

15 posted on 03/24/2008 10:07:20 AM PDT by Hazwaste (Vote! Vote for the conservative local, state, and national candidates of your choice, but VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste

Why would the Soviets or the Chinese bomb their customers?


16 posted on 03/24/2008 10:09:06 AM PDT by Philly Nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

When is this guy finally going to be extradited to Lithuania to stand trial?


17 posted on 03/24/2008 10:09:49 AM PDT by dfwgator (11+7+15=3 Heismans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Philly Nomad
Why would the Soviets or the Chinese bomb their customers? The Soviets do not exist.

China is not and will not be the only nation to have the capability of launching missile attacks on the U.S.

Not guarding against missile attack because of the possibility of a different type of attack is akin to not owning a fire extinguisher because there is a greater chance of dying of heart disease.

18 posted on 03/24/2008 10:17:24 AM PDT by Hazwaste (Vote! Vote for the conservative local, state, and national candidates of your choice, but VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

That’s right Gorby. We don’t trust Russians, Chinese, or Iranians.

Keep scrubbing that wine spot on your head, fella.


19 posted on 03/24/2008 10:19:28 AM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste
Not guarding against missile attack because of the possibility of a different type of attack is akin to not owning a fire extinguisher because there is a greater chance of dying of heart disease

Perfect.

20 posted on 03/24/2008 10:22:20 AM PDT by Pistolshot (Remember, no matter how bad your life is, someone is watching and enjoying your suffering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson