Posted on 03/23/2008 6:14:42 PM PDT by RDTF
“So you would never own a revolver either?”
I have one, so I guess that answers the question.
They do? I own one, and it’s never gone off when someone wasn’t pulling the trigger.
Been doing it for 15 years.
Luck ain’t a part of it.
Intelligence and training certainly are though.
My sentiments exactly
I imagine the airlines would like to fill those seats with paying passengers instead of gun toting security.
He’s wearing an ATF hat...
Did you see this little tidbit I found the other day?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1989826/posts
“That is the question that Glock haters avoid like the plague.”
I never said I hated them, I just think it has a very poorly designed safety that was put onto it for PC reasons. I’m not the only person who thinks that. A lot of shooters feel the same way. The gun itself is fine provided the operator knows the limitations of it.
My .45 Auto is a Ruger, but I still have a Dan Wesson .357, and it will shoot any time someone pulls the trigger. Shoots quite well, out of either barrel length...but if you jam it loaded into a bag, it can ‘accidentally discharge’ as well.
I agree with the US Army. There are no accidental discharges, only negligent ones!
So you do understand that if you pull the trigger it will make a bang-like noise just like a Glock?
You have yet to detail a real difference.
See #63 ... Eaker is playing gun god tonight, full of piss and vinegar. My son, with a class three license, swears by his Glocks, even bought his Mother one! I wouldn’t have one. My weapon is a 1911A with eight round mags. Keep handy a mag of Hydra Shoks and a mag of ball ammo.
It is called a transfer bar. All modern revolvers have a trigger safety.
Yep!
no glasses. that was a hell of a tidbit. holy sh&t.
I don’t know what make & model pistol was involved here, but odds are the gun was being played with, and the trigger got pulled.
As far as action designs, IMHO they should be using DA/SA autos equipped with hammer block safetys. These can be carried loaded with one in the chamber and the hammer down, safety on. In this condition, even pulling the trigger and dropping the hammer wil not fire the gun.
When needed, just push the safety off, and pull the trigger.
Simply put: easier to clean, holds up better under extreme cold, generally more accurate, more suited in larger calibers that might be necessary (Bear/Moose), the revolver for both self-defense and survival reasons is most often the better choice than the newer semi's. The much more mechanically complicated Glock, Beretta, Springfield, Sig etc., are also often more complicated to operate usually with many people having a hard time with the slide release etc. A stainless S&W with rubber grips for survival, or a hammerless compact lightweight 38 revolver for self defense is hard to beat. -IMHO
The Para LDA has a triple safety. The hand grip must be depressed to pull the trigger. The slide safety has to be manually switched to pull the trigger. And finally the internal safety disconnects the firing pin (unless the trigger is pulled) and this prevents a discharge if the weapon is dropped. Also the LDA has a true DA trigger with a very long pull like a revolver. It is unlike the DA on other semiautos.
Agreed. Sig Sauer for me.
Not at all. I am just tired of people with no practical experience parroting BS about a great gun design.
Normally one pings someone if they are going to bad mouth them.
I was never to enthusiastic about the program either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.