Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: svcw
I wonder sometimes if people like you even listen to or should I say understand his show.

I've been listening since 1991. And during that time I've heard him consistently underestimate the Clintons. He swore Bill would never get elected in 1992, he was convinced that Starr would force him from office, he promised Hillary would never get elected to the Senate and I think he even predicted a few years ago she would never run for President.

And, the thing is, I'm still listening to him and I NOW I hear him starting to say things about how, if Hillary gets elected in November, "at least we had fun" with Operation Chaos. He's already hedging his bets for when/if this backfires.

Rush is on record as saying that a Hillary win in November could be better for the GOP in the long run. Why should we assume he isn't still working that premise?

If he is, I would submit it's just one more example of him underestimating Clinton, Inc.

The man is playing with fire and I, for one, won't have sympathy if he gets burned. He should have learned better by now.

234 posted on 03/23/2008 7:11:38 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines

Rush is not running. The people playing with fire are the GOP. If they were serious, they would run a full bore, unapologetic Conservative. THEY are the ones should be blamed. You are letting THEM off the hook, and as long as that continues, we will get candidates like McCain.


243 posted on 03/23/2008 7:15:43 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
"Rush is on record as saying that a Hillary win in November could be better for the GOP in the long run. Why should we assume he isn't still working that premise?"

We shouldn't. He's as loyal to funding enemy military buildups (through trade deficits) and to US family-busting efforts as Hillary is. Duncan Hunter was the only truly pro-American candidate.


246 posted on 03/23/2008 7:16:21 PM PDT by familyop (Worthless male weekend warrior has-been trash with no degree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Let me add one more example of how Limbaugh has underestimated the Clintons. In 1996, he told a caller who was worried about Bob Dole not being aggressive enough against Clinton, “Don’t worry! Bob Dole will be the next President!”


266 posted on 03/23/2008 7:23:47 PM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Well, ok then, we must be listening to different Rush Limbaugh shows because the Rush I listen to is great and had never once said he underestimates the Clintons.
You'll have to tell me when your Rush broad casts his show.
271 posted on 03/23/2008 7:24:52 PM PDT by svcw (The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson