Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DHS will reissue controversial rules
http://www.investigativeproject.org/ ^ | 03/22/08

Posted on 03/23/2008 12:30:31 PM PDT by Sammy67

SAN FRANCISCO - The Homeland Security Department is appealing a judge's ruling against its proposal to force employers to fire workers whose names don't match their Social Security numbers, and promises to try to make the policy a law.

A federal judge in San Francisco blocked the "no-match rule" in October, saying it would likely impose hardships on businesses and their workers. Employers would incur new costs to comply with the regulation that the government hasn't evaluated, and innocent workers unable to correct mistakes in their records in time would lose their jobs, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer wrote.

In a document issued late Friday, the department addressed several of the judge's concerns, saying among other things that the rule doesn't create new legal obligations for businesses.

"It simply outlines clear steps

(Excerpt) Read more at investigativeproject.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: business; charlesbreyer; chertoff; crime; dhs; employment; homelandsecurity; identitythieft; illegalaliens; immigration; judge; sanfrancisco; socialsecurity

1 posted on 03/23/2008 12:30:31 PM PDT by Sammy67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

>A federal judge in San Francisco blocked the “no-match rule”<

Let me guess!

Another Clinton appointee?


2 posted on 03/23/2008 12:34:54 PM PDT by Califreak (Hangin' with Hunter-under the bus "Dread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

IMHO, it appears as though “Judge” Breyer is trying to legalize identity theft. I love this country!


3 posted on 03/23/2008 12:35:41 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Global warming" CAUSES global cooling? Sounds like globaloney to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
A federal judge in San Francisco blocked the "no-match rule" in October, saying it would likely impose hardships on businesses and their workers. Employers would incur new costs to comply with the regulation that the government hasn't evaluated, and innocent workers unable to correct mistakes in their records in time would lose their jobs, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer wrote.

Next stop, the 9th Circus....(mispelling intentional)

4 posted on 03/23/2008 12:48:56 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Do I need a Sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Since when do liberals worry about the added burdens and costs of regulations on business? Am I in a time warp?


5 posted on 03/23/2008 1:45:22 PM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67
More San Fran politics protecting the law breakers in the name of progressive thinking. Is there anything that comes out of that depraved, liberal cesspool of a city that does not hurt this country's security?
6 posted on 03/23/2008 2:32:36 PM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sammy67

Complete nonsense....both the lawsuit and it’s claims.

How is DHS going to FORCE employers to fire employees who have no-match numbers, when DHS has NO way of knowing who those employers are?

Social Security does not share that information re non-compliant employers with DHS, nor is it required to.

Just another of Bush/DHS’s dog and pony shows.


7 posted on 03/23/2008 7:18:30 PM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG
Social Security does not share that information re non-compliant employers with DHS, nor is it required to.

But they legally can, and do share information. But you're right, they are not required to.

8 posted on 03/24/2008 8:39:54 AM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson