[Publius6961]

The Australian is not the definitive science source to overturn all that.

Well, it's common to attack the messenger, in fact many of us are accused of exactly that when we challenge the Gore's conclusions.

The clear difference here is that the "Australians, not a definitive science source" are simply reporting the data findings of the new NASA Aqua Satellite; Al gore simply spouts opinions about facts he's incapable of understanding, unless he's acquired a climatologist or physics degree while we weren't looking.

Do you have any constructive comments about the new data?
No?

Thought so.

[gondramB]

>>The clear difference here is that the “Australians, not a definitive science source” are simply reporting the data findings of the new NASA Aqua Satellite; Al gore simply spouts opinions about facts he’s incapable of understanding, unless he’s acquired a climatologist or physics degree while we weren’t looking.

Do you have any constructive comments about the new data?
No?

Thought so.<<

No, they are reaching an unsubstantiated conclusion about the data and thus attacking the messenger is appropriate.