Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robot ’pack mule’ carries on
The Boston Herald ^ | March 22, 2008 | Jay Fitzgerald

Posted on 03/23/2008 7:16:46 AM PDT by afortiori

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Ramius
and you can't send it back for more supplies by itself

Yes, for that, you need a Collie named 'Lassie'. ;^)

21 posted on 03/23/2008 7:52:08 AM PDT by budwiesest (The Clinton fix is in. If these two crooks can't steal the election, nobody can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Well, a robot mule has the potential to be controlled by remote control. Also it can be pre programmed to follow a predetermined route. If it’s smart enough, you could just give it a some coordinates and let it find it’s own fastest and safest route there. A robot mule is perfectly obedient and never misunderstands your commands, and is theoretically infinitely repairable. On an assembly line a robot mule can be created in a matter of days, if not hours. A real mule will take years to grow to adulthood and train and must be cared for every day. Robot mules could be dissassembled and packed in crates and shipped to their destination half way around the world without regard to food, water, warmth, sanitation, etc on the voyage. If you have a bunch of damaged robot mules, you can mix and match parts to put together a few working oned.

Basically, the robot mule is superior in every way except one...the real mule has the ability to find it’s own fuel and live off the land if necessary.


22 posted on 03/23/2008 7:54:08 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Yes, that last bit is the most significant disadvantage. Until battery/ fuel technologies are improved, these mules will be a logistical nightmare, in the sense that for their usage in the real battlefields, and for the lengths a live mule train can cover, the fuel needs of the robotic ones will be gigantic.


23 posted on 03/23/2008 7:57:02 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Very cool but looks highly suceptible to mines, rockets, grenades, etc. So are Leathernecks, Grunts, Airmen, and Sailors.

Put some good sensors on it, and some weapons, and Grunts get to play Doom and Halo for real, from the comfort of an air-conditioned trailer stocked with beer

24 posted on 03/23/2008 7:59:51 AM PDT by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

unless they are so cheep to make that the become essentially disposable.


25 posted on 03/23/2008 8:00:22 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: afortiori

A rabbit sized version of the mule

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBSK7LYpg9w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYptK21vAgQ


26 posted on 03/23/2008 8:06:52 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode
A couple Ewoks and a length of rope and that things toast.

LOL!!!
27 posted on 03/23/2008 8:13:04 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD
Have you seen my dog?

LOL! Ain't that the truth. That is a scary looking device.

28 posted on 03/23/2008 8:16:17 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD
Image hosted by Photobucket.com tooo funny...
29 posted on 03/23/2008 8:40:38 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

And tasty if yer MRE drops don’t get there !


30 posted on 03/23/2008 8:47:27 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

So we should just abandon inventing new stuff, I guess. Technology has never resulted in any useful products.


31 posted on 03/23/2008 8:47:28 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan
Fascinating, and just a little scary for some reason.

My thoughts 'zackly.

At least put a head on the damn thing.

(plus, you're sure not gonna sneak up on anyone with that noisy contraption)

32 posted on 03/23/2008 8:53:21 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afortiori

It’s going to have to have a muffler system on it to be worth anything.


33 posted on 03/23/2008 9:02:14 AM PDT by ScratInTheHat (Don't like my immigration stance? I'm dyslexic. PC keeps sounding like BS to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afortiori

Those oddly-jointed legs make the thing look like a giant insect. Creepy.


34 posted on 03/23/2008 9:03:02 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RouxStir
Image hosted by Photobucket.com the Orange or Cherry drink powder, Tabasco, Salt and Pepper, and Sugar from a few MRE's makes for a great meat rub/baste too...
35 posted on 03/23/2008 9:05:33 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: afortiori

I see a lot more possibility in creating a “fanwing” based drone cargo or Medevac aircraft.

Background: www.fanwing.com

A fanwing is a type of more efficient, mechanically simple aircraft prop, that uses one or more centrifugal fans, similar to those used in evaporative coolers.

It is quieter, far simpler, and has a greater lift capacity than a helicopter. An initial lift of 1 to 1-1/2 tons of weight in the air with just a 100 hp engine.

It has a very stable flight pattern, and vertical lift, horizontal stability and propulsion are provided by the same fans.

Importantly, the Fanwing company aircraft design would probably not be optimal for the transport and delivery of cargo as a drone aircraft, but the research and development of a more suitable design should not be terribly difficult.

It is also more scalable than a helicopter, and far less dangerous for having no exposed blades. This means it could be just large enough to carry a single man and his equipment, either piloted by him or automatically; to a cargo aircraft capable of lifting a medium armored vehicle like a Stryker.


36 posted on 03/23/2008 9:28:43 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

“So we should just abandon inventing new stuff, I guess. Technology has never resulted in any useful products.”

So right! That $40 million wasted in developing Big Dog should have been spent in social welfare programs where it could have produced a bumper crop of what our ancestors called “bastards”.

Now, they are called “children of single parent families”./sarc off


37 posted on 03/23/2008 9:50:36 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

“Yes, that last bit is the most significant disadvantage. Until battery/ fuel technologies are improved, these mules will be a logistical nightmare, in the sense that for their usage in the real battlefields, and for the lengths a live mule train can cover, the fuel needs of the robotic ones will be gigantic.”

I imagine the same argument was used when the military first started using trucks.


38 posted on 03/23/2008 10:01:18 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Ask me again tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

The trucks didn’t run on electricity.

How useful would an electric truck be, with today’s technologies and costs?


39 posted on 03/23/2008 11:26:59 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

I have no idea what you are talking about. You seem to be arguing tha mules are better than trucks, I would say you need to stop drinking.
Big Dog can run on a variety of energy sources including gasoline, fuel cells, diesel, hybrid systems with gas/battery, etc. Currently it runs on compressed air in the lab and gasoline in the field.


40 posted on 03/23/2008 12:32:45 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Ask me again tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson