[ctdonath2]

What lower court's holding? I thought we were discussing US v Heller?

Willfully thick.

If you are discussing Heller, it's kind of hard to do so without sometimes referring to how Heller came to be (to wit: the lower court's holding, aka Parker).

[The KG9 Kid]

"... If you are discussing Heller, it's kind of hard to do so without sometimes referring to how Heller came to be (to wit: the lower court's holding, aka Parker)."

I think that was my point to RobertPaulsen way back in post #65.

I think I've followed RobertPaulsen's arguments correctly over the last few months. It seems that when the facts change, so do his arguments. It's always a contortion towards the worst possible scenario. Hey, he may be vindicated after all. I'm not clairvoyant and neither is he.

Lately though, I've started to wonder if he isn't Solicitor General Paul D. Clement. :)