Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposal would expand Security Council
AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/21/08 | Edith M. Lederer - ap

Posted on 03/21/2008 11:27:09 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: LibLieSlayer

I am a CONSERVATIVE in the tradition of William Buckley. If conservatives call each another ‘liberals’ in lieu of actual debate, it is sad.


41 posted on 03/22/2008 5:16:37 AM PDT by KingJaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: KingJaja
Conservatives do not elevate the Father of American Socialism (FDR) and Conservatives do not embrace and promote the un... an evil organization with connections directly to satan himself!

LLS

42 posted on 03/22/2008 6:00:30 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Could I ever vote for mcstain? osamabama hussein may convince me yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Hell no! We need to keep an eye on them. Move the UN to Montana.


43 posted on 03/22/2008 6:08:10 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

LLS,

That kind of thinking gives consevatism a very bad name. FDR was a man who led America during the greatest war in history and planned for the peace following war. He might have been naive about the Soviet Union but to suggest that he was in the same league as Marx and Engels is patently false.

When FDR became president, Milton Friedman was still in school and the most prominent economist was Keynes. No prominent Western government (Britain or France) dealt with the great depression using conservative economics, because the theoretical principles of conservative supply-side economics had not yet been fully developed. (Von Hayek wrote ‘the road to serfdom’ between 1940 - 43).

In fact, the modern Conservative movement did not gather steam until the 1950’s (led by William Buckley).

You cannot prove (from the Bible) that the UN has direct links to satan the same way you cannot prove whether the Fed has direct links to satan. However, you need to deal with both the Fed and the UN.

I am all for a conservatism based on logic and commonsense, not one based on gut feelings, fear and superstition.


44 posted on 03/22/2008 6:31:08 AM PDT by KingJaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: KingJaja

Then to Hell with Delhi, Botswana, Pretoria, Morocco and Brasilia. Feel free to join them on their trip.


45 posted on 03/22/2008 9:08:36 AM PDT by Mountain Troll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KingJaja

Sorry King, I’m in the FLUSH the UN camp, it is unredeemable...FDR’s (rip) ideal was poisoned from the beginning. All that it would take to destroy the UN is total de-funding from the US...no other UN member country gives a crap about anything except their skim.
The UN is NEST of Hate America and enabling our enemies.
Almost all Wars or Programs the UN is heavily involved in results in abject failure or worse. Can you name any UN sucesses?


46 posted on 03/22/2008 9:52:08 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: KingJaja
Your last post confirms my opinion. You speak like a liberal... you think like a liberal... ergo...

LLS

47 posted on 03/22/2008 10:08:39 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Could I ever vote for mcstain? osamabama hussein may convince me yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: KingJaja

I’d prefer us to get out to as to end any globalization hopes a future President might have. America is a sovereign nation, and very, very many of her sons and daughters will die before they let her fall.

And I’m not talking about the military.


48 posted on 03/22/2008 11:27:19 AM PDT by wastedyears (More Maiden coming up in a few months!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KingJaja
Did you think I needed a definition of the word? There's generally nothing Elitist at the “Mom-n-Pop” bakery, college reporter or Village Trustee. However within business, the media, academia, finance or government, Interdependency is an altar every globalist in bureaucracy prays upon. When independence or sovereignty is interject its castigated as outdated, immoral and dangerous so much as to shatter the bounds of the nation-state. Pretty much everything you covered under trade is regulated in Brussels or some other regional trade negotiation. You failed to mention our country's entangling alliances with foreign militaries or merged New Economies.

I know globalism and expansion of elitist institutions will continue to dominate and ultimately crush our nation. Most of it was driven from the US.

49 posted on 03/22/2008 1:13:04 PM PDT by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

We can’t eat our cake and have it. We set this ball rolling. Coke and Pepsi are sold in every nation on earth. Microsoft Windows is the defacto world standard. Reagan preached free trade.

Agreed, government should ensure that international trade agreements are just. We love to bash China, but the truth is that if the Chinese revalue their currency we will be in big trouble. It is not the fault of China that we have an almost zero savings rate.

It is not China’s fault that Germany (with a third of our population and higher labor costs) is the World’s largest exporter. If Chinese imports did not destroy German manufacturing, then why did they destroy ours?

Are we still competitive? We need to ask ourselves that question.


50 posted on 03/22/2008 6:16:19 PM PDT by KingJaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
Have you thought deeply about the consequences of leaving the UN?

No serious Republican/Conservative politician will take the US out of the UN and I hope you understand why. Even if Michael Savage were to be elected President, he wouldn't take the US out of the UN.

You haven't thought deeply about the consequences of America abandoning the international system. Conservatism should be driven by logic not emotion. Sure, it feels good to abandon the UN, but it is not practicable.

If we are out of the UN, with what legitimacy would we deal with China, India or any other nation for that matter. We needed a UN resolution to invade Iraq because we wanted to establish a precedent. If China goes on a rampage tomorrow, we have legal grounds to oppose them.

The strength of America is its moral right. There was a time when America could afford to ignore the World. We ignored the rest of the World at our own peril (WWI and WWII).

51 posted on 03/22/2008 6:34:38 PM PDT by KingJaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

How do you define conservatism? Who are your conservative heroes? Reagan? Burke? Friedman? von Hayek? Thatcher?

Please tell me how their views differ from mine?


52 posted on 03/22/2008 7:30:46 PM PDT by KingJaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson