Posted on 03/21/2008 11:27:09 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
Answer: “No”
I vote for removing the veto from France, since Napoleon is long dead.
Oh this would be fantastic. You know things always get agreed upon much quicker with a larger group.
NO, and remove Russia who never deserved it in the first place.
especially the UN which is an organization of diplomats who purpose in life is bashing the US and Isreal and banging NYC escorts.
AS far as Africa is concerned, let’s see if you can feed yourself on your own for awhile without attacking your neighbors or brutalizing your own citizens for a whole year, and then any of those countries who can do these two things can have a shot at a seat.
Yeah, they gotta kick the UN out of NYC. Send em all back to the Beast building in Brussels. They think it’s such a cool building anyway.
By all means, lets create more permanent memberships with veto power so that the UN will never be able to reach any consensus on anything.
By all means give a permanent seat to Iran and Venezuela, maybe even a 10 year gig for Raul. /UltraMegaGigaGoogleplexDrippingSarc
After the UK ratifies the Lesbian Treaty, it is slated to give up its Security Council veto seat to EUrotopia.
yitbos
I think there ought to be 40 members on the security council...and both Panama and Guyana ought to have permanent seats...along with the King of Tonga. Of course...this would require a much larger chamber...so we gotta build a new place in New York for these folks....and I would prefer we use union labor. This might take a while...but I think in twelve years...we could build a real assembly building for these folks.
NWO
US out of the UN, UN out of the US.
I vote for the UN to expel the US from all membership rights and obligations, and remove their operations from all US territory.
Ha! I wish I thought of that. You’re a diabolical genius! I’m nominating you for the security council.
Let’s be very clear about this, the UN Security Council is in dire need of reform. Brazil, India, Japan and Germany are all US allies and responsible nations.
We should be careful not to belittle India’s desire for a seat on the UN Security Council. India is the World’s largest democracy, a natural ally and a potential counterweight to China. India’s economic growth is remarkable and with economic growth comes responsibility.
It doesn’t help our standing in India when Russia supports India on the Security Council and we don’t.
Let’s get out of the ‘Cold War’ mentality. The next great conflict is not going to be in Europe. This century is likely to be an Asian/American dominated affair. What clout does France and Britain have in Burma, North Korea, ‘The Stans’ and South East Asia?
We need to stop playing last century’s game this century.
Amen. Why should some of the most failed nations in the world have a seat on the Security Council—especially permanent ones? Makes no sense to me!!
The U.N. gets more ineffectual every day. This will only make it more so—faster.
Thanks, but since my country should be banned from the UN, If nominated, I will not run, if elected, I will not serve.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.