Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expenses At U.N. Balloon 25 Percent U.S. Demands on Body Help Drive Up Budget
Washington Post ^ | March 21, 2008 | Colum Lynch

Posted on 03/21/2008 12:42:19 PM PDT by TopQuark

Expenses At U.N. Balloon 25 Percent U.S. Demands on Body Help Drive Up Budget

UNITED NATIONS -- Despite long-standing efforts by successive U.S. administrations to rein in U.N. spending, the United Nations this month presented its top donors with a request for nearly $1.1 billion in additional funds over the next two years -- boosting current U.N. expenses by 25 percent and marking the global body's highest-ever administrative budget, according to internal U.N. memos.

Much of the increased spending flows from Bush administration demands for a more ambitious U.N. role around the world. During President Bush's tenure, the United States has signed off on billions of dollars for U.N. peacekeeping operations in Sudan and elsewhere, and authorized hundreds of millions for U.N. efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq, where U.N. officials helped organize elections and draft a new constitution. .....

"This is a breakdown of a 20-year-long effort to rein in U.N. spending," said John R. Bolton, who served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations early in Bush's second term. "What happened in the late part of the Clinton administration, but most spectacularly in the Bush administration, is that the principle of zero nominal growth broke down completely."

That principle required the United Nations to maintain its administrative budget at the same level each year, meeting the costs of inflation through spending cuts.

The additional funds in the latest request would be used to renovate the landmark U.N. headquarters in New York, fund war-crimes investigators in Lebanon and pay $100 million to build a reinforced, attack-resistant U.N. headquarters building in Baghdad. But they would also be used to pay nearly $7 million for a 2009 anti-racism conference in Durban, South Africa, which Washington believes would serve as a forum to bash Israel.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Well, when nobody minds incrases in our own budget, who will cares of the U.N. expenses?
1 posted on 03/21/2008 12:42:22 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

A joke, right?


2 posted on 03/21/2008 12:44:11 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
and pay $100 million to build a reinforced, attack-resistant U.N. headquarters building in Baghdad.

You've got to be kidding.

3 posted on 03/21/2008 12:46:20 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
A hundred million dollars for a bulletproof UN building in Baghdad.

Seems to me like Kofi's oil for food program should cover that...

4 posted on 03/21/2008 12:46:32 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Put some more grease on the gears of the Printing Presses. Seems the Gov’t and the Fed are enlarging their scope of involvement and control through economic as opposed to electoral means.
5 posted on 03/21/2008 12:46:33 PM PDT by TCats (The Clintons Are Not Just Wrong - They Are Certifiable AND Dangerous! See my Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

And yet we just keep on keepin’ on with these asshats.


6 posted on 03/21/2008 12:46:53 PM PDT by TheZMan (I'm going to write my own name on the ballot. Screw the current crop of "conservatives".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Go get the money from Tofu Anon. He stole at least that much when he was Secretary General!


7 posted on 03/21/2008 12:47:04 PM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

If we’re costing the UN so much money, maybe we should just quit so they can save 25 percent. We’ll turn their headquarters into a casino or something.


8 posted on 03/21/2008 12:49:59 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

A bordello for former NYC officials might be useful.

(snark)


9 posted on 03/21/2008 1:09:31 PM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

Why give one dime to the Useless Nations?


10 posted on 03/21/2008 1:19:36 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Expenses At U.N. Balloon 25 Percent U.S. Demands on Body Help Drive Up Budget

Can someone help explain what this means in English

11 posted on 03/21/2008 1:20:47 PM PDT by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

screw them!!!!

US out of the UN......UN out of the US!!!!!

let some turd world muzzie lovin cesspool nation fund it!!!!


12 posted on 03/21/2008 1:23:41 PM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
We’ll turn their headquarters into a casino or something.

Might I suggest a museum of organizational corruption?

Clinton, er, THE Clintons would have their own wing, along side the UN, the city of Chicago, Cook County, NYC, ....

13 posted on 03/21/2008 1:29:19 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

The UN has a balloon, and said balloon’s expenses are 25% above budget?


14 posted on 03/21/2008 1:38:13 PM PDT by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
We’ll turn their headquarters into a casino or something.

I thought it already was... They certainly have enough suckers, shady dealers, pit bosses and rigged games operating there.

15 posted on 03/21/2008 1:53:21 PM PDT by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
I'm all for spending money on the UN - as long as it is for tearing down the building.

UN Go Home!

UN out of US!

16 posted on 03/21/2008 1:59:10 PM PDT by Left2Right ("Democracy isn't perfect, but other governments are so much worse (especially Iran's)")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Left2Right

No, that’s a waste of a perfectly good building. Just think of the revenue we could get out of it when it’s turned into a regular office building.


17 posted on 03/21/2008 2:55:44 PM PDT by Expendable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Demands on Body Help Drive Up Budget...

You hear that from whores everywhere ...


18 posted on 03/21/2008 4:44:21 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

The UN got away with the oil for blood scam. Kofi and his son should have gone to prison. They are or were their own entity and investigated themselves.
Claudia Rossett should have won a pulitzer for all the work she did in exposing the UN and the blood on their hands.
Bush stood up a little to them on the Kyoto Treaty and on Iraq and Saddam, on reparations for slavery and on one meeting when they wanted to label the jews as zionist.
But they got away with stealing and murder and they should be labeled a terrorist organization.


19 posted on 03/21/2008 6:25:37 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

“The additional funds in the latest request would be used to renovate the landmark U.N. headquarters in New York,...”

I think that’s the money quote of the article right there. This is the U.N. guiding the Camel’s nose to the edge of the tent as thus far they haven’t succeeded in gaining a specific commitment from the U.S they seek. All the rest of the listed “reasons” may or may not be legitimate, but these asshats have been trying for years to get the U.S. to anti up big bucks to build them a glorious palace. They really aren’t satisfied with renovations to the existing facilities as much as they want us to build them a new one.

To “H” with them all. Get the U.S. out of the U.N., and the U.N. out of the U.S. That’ll save us one “H” of a lot more than the 25%.


20 posted on 03/21/2008 8:42:43 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson