Posted on 03/21/2008 7:34:44 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
I changed online and just got my card in the mail 2 days ago.I am voting for B.O.
Another misleading headline from a liberal weenie headline writer.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1989330/posts
Parade-goers in Scranton Adore Hillary: “Girls Screamed like when the Beatles Arrived”
I agree!!! We have to make sure that he is either the nominee or that the Dem party fractures itslf if they don't give it to him.
*Ping
But when the Dems lose, you KNOW they’re going to scream FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD and they’ll point to the large number of registered Dems. I don’t know if I like this...
*Ping
I would caution Republicans to FIRST look at the local GOP races to see if you need to vote in the GOP primary. There almost always are such races.
With the low turnout, conservatives can take back local positions and nominations in the GOP.
“I am in PA and was going to switch to vote for Obama to knock ole Hill out, but after this past week, I am not sure he would be any better than Hill, whereas I did before.”
Obama will be better only in that he will lose bigger.
Heres all any Conservative needs to know about Barrack Hussein Obama:
Special Interest Group Ratings:
Planned Parenthood - 100% Support
National Right To Life - 0% Support
NARAL - 100% Support
Americans for Tax Reform - 0% Support
ACLU - 83% Support
NEA - 100% Support
NOW Hags - 100% Support
Citizens Against Government Waste - 13% Support
Gun Owners of America - 0% Support
NRA - F Rating
Federation for American Immigration Reform - 0% Support
US Border Patrol - 8% Support
Unions - 82% - 100% Support
Population Connection - 100% Support (These are the Zero Growth freaks)
http://vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=BS030017
[Barrack Hussein Obamas record in the Illinois senate:]
- Opposed the Defense of Marriage Act; would work to repeal it in the U.S. Senate; would not vote for any legislation that would restrict the ability of gays and lesbians to marry.
- Opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act four times in Illinois. A similar bill passed the U.S. Senate 98-0. The Born Alive bill would have prohibited a baby from being born alive but left to die according to the mothers wishes. Obama inexplicably opposed this bill not once, twice, or three times, but four times.
- Obama took almost $90,000 in bundled contributions from the Council for a Livable World. The council is a well-known anti-defense organization.
- Obama puts rigid ideology before whats best for the people of Illinois, and presumably he would do that as President as well. He has on several occasions made public his opposition to the NAFTA trade agreement and his belief that it must be negotiated. All the while thanks to NAFTA, Illinois exports $1.3 billion in agricultural goods to Canada.
- Obama refused to vote for a bill in the Illinois State Senate that would have increased penalties for drug traffickers.
- Obama voted against a bill that would have delivered the death penalty to gang members who murder first responders.
- Finally, just in case you thought it couldnt get any worse, Obama was the only member of the Illinois State Senate to vote against a bill that prohibited early release for sexual predators.
I agree, operation chaos should vote for Obama here. The goal is to keep the Hillary margin lower than blowout proportion. Hillary can’t win the pledged delegates, her only chance is to get the popular vote edge. If she can’t get that edge, Obama should be the nominee. Last week, before the Wright case, Obama would be very tough to beat, but now - with his white granny, to the typical white person quotes, let alone the “god damn Amerika” video - he is a lot more beatable...he may have the young, the white liberals, but the working class whites (the Reagan Democrats) will have a hard time to vote for a candidate pro-affirmative action, talking them down as typical white persons etc etc...We want to keep the beast fighting for the long haul to bloody up Obama, but utlimately Obama would be a more beatable candidate in the general vs McCain.
So his “blame whitey for making us blackies be racist” speech moved you ? That’s just sad.
If Hillary wins and implements half of what she wishes it will shock America, maybe to the point where they have had enough of modern liberal/progressivism.
Of course, either could take down the country with all the libs in the house/senate and packing the supreme court, but I would rather have it blamed where it belongs than on the Grand Old Party.
Interesting, although it’s not something that I can bring myself to do....
That’s a great point. It’s also a point that could be rendered moot were the citizens of this country to act like citizens and not subjects. If the vast majority of voting adults were involved in the future of their country, cross-overs wouldn’t have as much effect, and we might not be faced with the 3-way disaster we’re looking at today.
You could probably go up to any person and get them to complain about gas prices, taxes, etc. But the percentage of those people who are actively involved in electing people to deal with their concerns would be a mere fraction. So long as most people are semi-comfortable, they’re perfectly fine with ignoring the direction we’re heading.
Too bad most people aren’t as involved as everyone here.
That’s just nuts. McCain will be a one term President and maybe the conservatives will get their act together and put forth a serious and electable candidate. McCain will not do as much damage to the country as either of the other two.
How true...
especially with the military...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.