[Hunble]

If the SCOTUS makes the wrong choice, then the people can use arms against them.

Is that clear enough?

[Hunble]

Now if the SCOTUS makes the wrong choice, and if the people decide to react, then the people will use all possible arms against them.

Arms could be anything from bactria to atomic weapons, and they will never know what will be targeted against them.

That is why the government was forbidden to be involved with this subject in any way. If they abuse their powers, then the people can and will use arms against them.

[wku man]

Is that clear enough?

Uh, not really. I'm saying that if I disagreed with a law enough to disobey it, and was punished for that civil disobedience, I wouldn't just accept that punishment as legitimate, and would probably get the living sh** kicked out of me for resisting arrest. Bad law = bad punishment for disobeying bad law.

If you're speaking specifically about Heller case, well, that remains to be seen. I sure hope it doesn't come to that, but that's why the RKBA was included in the BoR in the first place, right?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!