[CindyDawg]

Ok. See, I’m not bothered that it was pointed out I used the wrong terminology. Actually it just encouraged me to do some reviewing. Obviously some of yall are more “evolved”, regarding Evolution. I’m willing to listen to others thoughts and ideas but my concern was, and still is that the rest of us, daily, are being told this is fact. If creation was presented this way, people would be screaming from the roof tops. We are seeing the same with GW. People just need to ask questions. When did “why” or “how” become bad words?

[allmendream]

Indeed they are not. I am a Scientist and asking questions about the natural world is what we do. Most scientific language is couched in equivocation to denote the provisional nature of the suggested explanation.

‘finding indicates’
‘This research solidifies the evidence’
‘by way of the analysis, we see no special phylogenetic connection’

All of the above were taken from the article. This is not presenting it as settled fact, merely what the evidence (so far) indicates, acording to the authors.