Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recession math smacks head-on into Reagan myth (Two Bagger)
AJC ^ | March 20,2008 | Jay Bookman

Posted on 03/20/2008 1:43:52 PM PDT by groanup

Georgia Republicans have a choice to make, a choice between math and myth.

The math is pretty simple: We're heading into a major recession that a lot of economists predict could be deeper and longer than anything we've experienced in a generation or longer. Already, state revenues have begun to fall significantly, raising fear of budget shortfalls.

Recession math smacks head-on into Reagan myth Jekyll Island deserves a planned, professional upgrade Local control trashed in great power grab of '08 Peeling off from the herd shows Obama's patriotism Speaker's tax proposal badly flawed Hillary's defeated; GOP sets its sights on Obama Vive le veto of power-mad Gold Domers

In California, the situation has already gotten so bad that 20,000 school employees may soon be laid off to balance the budget.

Under such circumstances, basic math says that passing significant tax cuts would compound the problem. It would turn potentially serious budget cutbacks into something truly traumatic.

But then there's the myth, as embodied in Ronald Reagan. The Reagan myth says that there's no such thing as a bad time to cut taxes. The Reagan myth says that cutting taxes will boost the economy, and thus government revenue. So when House Speaker Glenn Richardson touts his plan to eliminate the car tax, he cites Reagan as his tax-cutting model, claiming that it will stimulate the economy.

(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Another liberal who refuses to believe that leaving money in the hands of those that earned it and letting it grow is worse than giving it to idiot bureaucrats to throw away. Bookman refuses to believe that tax cuts stimulate the economy.

He moans about recession and doesn't want a tax cut. Go figure.

His e mail is jaybookman@ajc.com

1 posted on 03/20/2008 1:43:52 PM PDT by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: groanup

“It’s simple economics son. I don’t understand it at all.”


2 posted on 03/20/2008 1:49:22 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup

Reagan economics also meant that you held the line on spending.

Bush economics says no such thing


3 posted on 03/20/2008 1:50:19 PM PDT by misterrob (Obama-Does America Need Another Jimmy Carter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Not all tax cuts are equal. Those that help capital investment by increasing the rate of return after taxes and those that lower marginal rates of taxation on labor both tend to stimulate the economy. The first Bush tax cut didn't help the economy much because it had almost no effect on the margin. The second of the Bush cuts was a good one. Unfortunately it is due to expire, making US investments even less attractive to buyers overseas.

If the treasury would announce a policy of adjusting the dollar to a set gold price (so that foreign investors wouldn't see their profits evaporates as the US devalues the dollar) and Washington attempted to adjust tax policy so that real rates of return in the US were again competitive world-wide, we might see this downturn stopped without too much carnage.

4 posted on 03/20/2008 1:56:50 PM PDT by free_for_now (No Dick Dale in the R&R HOF? - for shame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup

“We’re heading into a major recession that a lot of economists predict could be deeper and longer than anything we’ve experienced in a generation or longer”
and other economist state that we’ve bottomed, GNP Growth this year could ‘dive’ to 1.5%, and recession will be avoided (again). GNP Growth next year returns to about 3%. Agreed, he’s another liberal who won’t see the end to doom and gloom ‘til he elects his favorite communist!


5 posted on 03/20/2008 2:10:43 PM PDT by CRBDeuce (an armed society is a polite society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Under such circumstances, basic math says that passing significant tax cuts would compound the problem. It would turn potentially serious budget cutbacks into something truly traumatic.

Budget cuts that are traumatic for politicians and liberals? Be still my heart.

6 posted on 03/20/2008 2:16:53 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (NAFTA opponents are an odd coalition of the no-deodorant Left and the toothless-and-tinfoil right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Recession math smacks head-on into Reagan myth Jekyll Island deserves a planned, professional upgrade Local control trashed in great power grab of '08 Peeling off from the herd shows Obama's patriotism Speaker's tax proposal badly flawed Hillary's defeated; GOP sets its sights on Obama Vive le veto of power-mad Gold Domers

This paragraph is probably the one that makes the most sense out of all from this article.

7 posted on 03/20/2008 2:51:29 PM PDT by CrosscutSaw (God is sovereign -- Jesus is Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free_for_now
Not all tax cuts are equal.

Good point. The Georgia legislator proposing a cut in the car tax is wrong when he claims it will help the economy. In my book, of course, all tax cuts are good, but they don't all lead to economic growth.

The Governor's idea to cut income taxes is the right answer -- it will help spur investment. Cutting employment taxes (Workmens' Comp., etc.) would also be a wise move.

8 posted on 03/20/2008 3:11:58 PM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Econonmists are major experts. They can look at all the past trends and bumps and ups and downs and explain all of them in precise detail. Yet none of them, nor all of them put together, can give anyone anything close to a semi-accurate guess as to what will happen tomorrow, let alone even longer into the future.

I'm getting to consider "economists" in the same boat as "journalists", global warmers and politicians. They are all mentally devoid of any functioning brain cells and work hard, day in and day out to give us proof of that fact.

9 posted on 03/20/2008 4:24:17 PM PDT by hadit2here ("Most men would rather die than think. Many do." - Bertrand Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson