Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ari-freedom
I would if they hadn't told me the debate was over and consensus had been reached. True science does not need a consensus. E=mc2. F=ma. You get the idea.

What is your take on global warming?

Before you answer notice I said man-made global warming in my original post.

39 posted on 03/20/2008 11:21:29 AM PDT by Bigoleelephant (Lawyers are to America what lead was to Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Bigoleelephant

my take on AGW? I think it is probably real. I don’t think the debate should be over. Science is always supposed to be a tentative process.
But you have to actually have a scientific debate and not simply reject the idea simply because some people turned it into a new religion.
As a conservative, I would actually expect AGW because there are no property rights for air and no free market. One would expect air to be a dumping free for all.


43 posted on 03/20/2008 1:23:04 PM PDT by ari-freedom (McCain must pick a conservative VP if he wants conservative support)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson