How Those Deceptive Numbers Creep In (BLS)
Phantom GDP and Comparative Advantage
International Political Economy Zone
Note that here, Paul Craig Roberts is not discussing the Bush Administration's claims of growth in the past, but rather the assumptions it is making about growth in the future, placing him in the unenviable rhetorical position of deriding an assumption because it is, well, an assumption.
That being said, he does subscribe to the view that GDP and output are overstated (just not here) for the reasons BusinessWeek suggests. He just can't explain himself when someone asks him how much they are overstated . . . which is important, because some economists who have examined his assumptions find no significant impact on the question. In other words, other economists' replies to Roberts' warning about the methodology-problem are basically, "so what? Even if we use your numbers your conclusion is not supported."